From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Fedyk Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 21:54:58 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] 2.2 vs 2.4 for TC Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 01:51:15PM -0500, Nikolai Vladychevski wrote: > Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > A while ago I saw a message saying that the TC features in 2.2 aren't > > very mature, and I'm wondering what I'd be missing out on if I stayed > > with 2.2 instead of using 2.4 now. > > download 2.4.6 > download 2.2.lastest > > make a diff on net/sched directory and see the difference. You would > miss like 2000 lines of bugfixes if you stay with 2.2, but anyway 2.4.6 > is not yet stable with "tc features", so if it works for you dont move > it until 2.4.15 or so ... Are you saying that the QoS traffic control features have stability problems, or is this just general 2.4 instability? _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/