From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI device list locking
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 01:05:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-hotplug-101529104508773@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-hotplug-101528672932410@msgid-missing>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 487 bytes --]
On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 16:17, Greg KH wrote:
> In short, I don't think you can use a spinlock, but rather a semaphore
> is probably necessary.
Sage advice indeed!
Take 2: with semaphores
Again, this is just fixes to the core pci code. Various drivers and arch
specific code still traverse the pci_devices list without the
pcidevlist_sem. If there are no complaints with this code (probably just
wishful thinking) I'll go on and clean up those unprotected traversals.
thanks,
-john
[-- Attachment #2: pcidevlist_lock.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 7537 bytes --]
Index: linux24/drivers/pci/pci.c
diff -u linux24/drivers/pci/pci.c:1.1.1.1 linux24/drivers/pci/pci.c:1.1.1.1.28.20
--- linux24/drivers/pci/pci.c:1.1.1.1 Tue Dec 18 15:49:16 2001
+++ linux24/drivers/pci/pci.c Mon Mar 4 17:03:27 2002
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
LIST_HEAD(pci_root_buses);
LIST_HEAD(pci_devices);
+DECLARE_MUTEX(pcidevlist_sem);
/**
* pci_find_slot - locate PCI device from a given PCI slot
@@ -55,10 +56,14 @@
{
struct pci_dev *dev;
+ down(&pcidevlist_sem);
pci_for_each_dev(dev) {
- if (dev->bus->number == bus && dev->devfn == devfn)
+ if (dev->bus->number == bus && dev->devfn == devfn){
+ up(&pcidevlist_sem);
return dev;
+ }
}
+ up(&pcidevlist_sem);
return NULL;
}
@@ -81,17 +86,23 @@
unsigned int ss_vendor, unsigned int ss_device,
const struct pci_dev *from)
{
- struct list_head *n = from ? from->global_list.next : pci_devices.next;
+ struct list_head *n;
+
+ down(&pcidevlist_sem);
+ n = from ? from->global_list.next : pci_devices.next;
while (n != &pci_devices) {
struct pci_dev *dev = pci_dev_g(n);
if ((vendor == PCI_ANY_ID || dev->vendor == vendor) &&
(device == PCI_ANY_ID || dev->device == device) &&
(ss_vendor == PCI_ANY_ID || dev->subsystem_vendor == ss_vendor) &&
- (ss_device == PCI_ANY_ID || dev->subsystem_device == ss_device))
+ (ss_device == PCI_ANY_ID || dev->subsystem_device == ss_device)){
+ up(&pcidevlist_sem);
return dev;
+ }
n = n->next;
}
+ up(&pcidevlist_sem);
return NULL;
}
@@ -130,14 +141,19 @@
struct pci_dev *
pci_find_class(unsigned int class, const struct pci_dev *from)
{
- struct list_head *n = from ? from->global_list.next : pci_devices.next;
+ struct list_head *n;
+ down(&pcidevlist_sem);
+ n = from ? from->global_list.next : pci_devices.next;
while (n != &pci_devices) {
struct pci_dev *dev = pci_dev_g(n);
- if (dev->class == class)
+ if (dev->class == class){
+ up(&pcidevlist_sem);
return dev;
+ }
n = n->next;
}
+ up(&pcidevlist_sem);
return NULL;
}
@@ -605,10 +621,12 @@
int count = 0;
list_add_tail(&drv->node, &pci_drivers);
+ down(&pcidevlist_sem);
pci_for_each_dev(dev) {
if (!pci_dev_driver(dev))
count += pci_announce_device(drv, dev);
}
+ up(&pcidevlist_sem);
return count;
}
@@ -628,6 +646,7 @@
struct pci_dev *dev;
list_del(&drv->node);
+ down(&pcidevlist_sem);
pci_for_each_dev(dev) {
if (dev->driver == drv) {
if (drv->remove)
@@ -635,6 +654,7 @@
dev->driver = NULL;
}
}
+ up(&pcidevlist_sem);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG
@@ -716,7 +736,9 @@
pci_insert_device(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_bus *bus)
{
list_add_tail(&dev->bus_list, &bus->devices);
+ down(&pcidevlist_sem);
list_add_tail(&dev->global_list, &pci_devices);
+ up(&pcidevlist_sem);
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
pci_proc_attach_device(dev);
#endif
@@ -751,7 +773,9 @@
dev->driver = NULL;
}
list_del(&dev->bus_list);
+ down(&pcidevlist_sem);
list_del(&dev->global_list);
+ up(&pcidevlist_sem);
pci_free_resources(dev);
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
pci_proc_detach_device(dev);
@@ -1327,7 +1351,9 @@
* Link the device to both the global PCI device chain and
* the per-bus list of devices.
*/
+ down(&pcidevlist_sem);
list_add_tail(&dev->global_list, &pci_devices);
+ up(&pcidevlist_sem);
list_add_tail(&dev->bus_list, &bus->devices);
/* Fix up broken headers */
@@ -1935,9 +1961,11 @@
pcibios_init();
+ down(&pcidevlist_sem);
pci_for_each_dev(dev) {
pci_fixup_device(PCI_FIXUP_FINAL, dev);
}
+ up(&pcidevlist_sem);
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
pm_register(PM_PCI_DEV, 0, pci_pm_callback);
Index: linux24/drivers/pci/proc.c
diff -u linux24/drivers/pci/proc.c:1.1.1.1 linux24/drivers/pci/proc.c:1.1.1.1.28.3
--- linux24/drivers/pci/proc.c:1.1.1.1 Tue Dec 18 15:49:16 2001
+++ linux24/drivers/pci/proc.c Mon Mar 4 16:55:22 2002
@@ -306,17 +306,26 @@
/* iterator */
static void *pci_seq_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
{
- struct list_head *p = &pci_devices;
- loff_t n = *pos;
-
- /* XXX: surely we need some locking for traversing the list? */
+ struct list_head *p;
+ loff_t n;
+ down(&pcidevlist_sem);
+ p = &pci_devices;
+ n = *pos;
while (n--) {
p = p->next;
- if (p == &pci_devices)
+ if (p == &pci_devices){
+ up(&pcidevlist_sem);
return NULL;
+ }
}
+ up(&pcidevlist_sem);
return p;
}
+
+/*
+XXX: pci_seq_next() doesn't use pcidevlist_sem, make sure
+you down it before calling. (Currently unused?)
+*/
static void *pci_seq_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
struct list_head *p = v;
@@ -559,9 +568,11 @@
entry = create_proc_entry("devices", 0, proc_bus_pci_dir);
if (entry)
entry->proc_fops = &proc_bus_pci_dev_operations;
+ down(&pcidevlist_sem);
pci_for_each_dev(dev) {
pci_proc_attach_device(dev);
}
+ up(&pcidevlist_sem);
entry = create_proc_entry("pci", 0, NULL);
if (entry)
entry->proc_fops = &proc_pci_operations;
Index: linux24/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
diff -u linux24/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c:1.1.1.1 linux24/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c:1.1.1.1.28.4
--- linux24/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c:1.1.1.1 Tue Dec 18 15:49:16 2001
+++ linux24/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c Mon Mar 4 16:55:22 2002
@@ -222,9 +222,11 @@
ranges.found_vga = 0;
pbus_assign_resources(b, &ranges);
}
+ down(&pcidevlist_sem);
pci_for_each_dev(dev) {
pdev_enable_device(dev);
}
+ up(&pcidevlist_sem);
}
/* Check whether the bridge supports I/O forwarding.
Index: linux24/drivers/pci/setup-irq.c
diff -u linux24/drivers/pci/setup-irq.c:1.1.1.1 linux24/drivers/pci/setup-irq.c:1.1.1.1.28.2
--- linux24/drivers/pci/setup-irq.c:1.1.1.1 Tue Dec 18 15:49:16 2001
+++ linux24/drivers/pci/setup-irq.c Mon Mar 4 16:55:22 2002
@@ -65,7 +65,9 @@
int (*map_irq)(struct pci_dev *, u8, u8))
{
struct pci_dev *dev;
+ down(&pcidevlist_sem);
pci_for_each_dev(dev) {
pdev_fixup_irq(dev, swizzle, map_irq);
}
+ up(&pcidevlist_sem);
}
Index: linux24/drivers/pnp/isapnp.c
diff -u linux24/drivers/pnp/isapnp.c:1.1.1.2 linux24/drivers/pnp/isapnp.c:1.1.1.2.2.4
--- linux24/drivers/pnp/isapnp.c:1.1.1.2 Wed Feb 13 14:53:31 2002
+++ linux24/drivers/pnp/isapnp.c Mon Mar 4 16:55:22 2002
@@ -1685,10 +1685,14 @@
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
if (!isapnp_skip_pci_scan) {
+ down(&pcidevlist_sem);
pci_for_each_dev(dev) {
- if (dev->irq == irq)
+ if (dev->irq == irq){
+ up(&pcidevlist_sem);
return 1;
+ }
}
+ up(&pcidevlist_sem);
}
#endif
if (request_irq(irq, isapnp_test_handler, SA_INTERRUPT, "isapnp", NULL))
Index: linux24/include/linux/pci.h
diff -u linux24/include/linux/pci.h:1.1.1.1 linux24/include/linux/pci.h:1.1.1.1.28.9
--- linux24/include/linux/pci.h:1.1.1.1 Tue Dec 18 15:49:00 2001
+++ linux24/include/linux/pci.h Mon Mar 4 16:57:00 2002
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
#ifndef LINUX_PCI_H
#define LINUX_PCI_H
-
+#include <asm/semaphore.h>
/*
* Under PCI, each device has 256 bytes of configuration address space,
* of which the first 64 bytes are standardized as follows:
@@ -435,6 +435,7 @@
extern struct list_head pci_root_buses; /* list of all known PCI buses */
extern struct list_head pci_devices; /* list of all devices */
+extern struct semaphore pcidevlist_sem;
/*
* Error values that may be returned by PCI functions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-05 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-04 23:54 [PATCH] PCI device list locking john stultz
2002-03-05 0:17 ` Greg KH
2002-03-05 1:05 ` john stultz [this message]
2002-03-05 1:12 ` Craig Christophel
2002-03-05 1:47 ` john stultz
2002-03-06 1:31 ` Martin Diehl
2002-03-10 12:07 ` Martin Mares
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-hotplug-101529104508773@msgid-missing \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.