From: Hirofumi Fujita <h-fujita@ebina.hitachi.co.jp>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Linux-ia64] SW IO TLB buffer management in kernel test10
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 08:15:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590678205720@msgid-missing> (raw)
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1254", Size: 2364 bytes --]
Hi,
there seems to be a problem on buffer management of SW IO TLB.
The contents of io_tlb_list[] become broken.
This happens when a machine has more then 2GB memory,
and CD-ROM or SCSI (>4GB addressing is disabled) are accessed.
But there may be another bug ?
I applied the attached patch and kernel panic when mke2fs /dev/sda4.
(QLogic BIOS setting: >4GB addressing is disabled)
Kernel panic: __pci_map_single: could not allocate software IO TLB (16384 bytes)
At this time, io_tlb_list[] are almost 0.
Same with swiotlb\x1024 option (which extends this bounce buffer to
8192 x 2KB).
With swiotlb92 option, mke2fs successes,
but 60% of io_tlb_list[] remain 0 after mke2fs finished.
This is because pci_unmap is not called correctly ?
Hirofumi Fujita
Hitachi, Ltd.
--- linux-2.4.0-test10-ia64-001101/arch/ia64/kernel/pci-dma.c.org Mon Nov 13 12:05:13 2000
+++ linux-2.4.0-test10-ia64-001101/arch/ia64/kernel/pci-dma.c Wed Nov 15 16:19:12 2000
@@ -109,7 +109,8 @@
{
unsigned long flags;
char *dma_addr;
- unsigned int i, nslots, stride, index, wrap;
+ unsigned int nslots, stride, index, wrap;
+ int i;
/*
* For mappings greater than a page size, we limit the stride (and hence alignment)
@@ -133,7 +134,7 @@
wrap = index = ALIGN(io_tlb_index, stride);
if (index >= io_tlb_nslabs)
- index = 0;
+ wrap = index = 0;
do {
/*
@@ -142,8 +143,11 @@
* entries as '0' indicating unavailable.
*/
if (io_tlb_list[index] >= nslots) {
+ int count = 0;
for (i = index; i < index + nslots; i++)
io_tlb_list[i] = 0;
+ for (i = index - 1; (i >= 0) && io_tlb_list[i]; i--)
+ io_tlb_list[i] = ++count;
dma_addr = io_tlb_start + (index << IO_TLB_SHIFT);
/*
@@ -210,14 +214,10 @@
int count = ((index + nslots) < io_tlb_nslabs ? io_tlb_list[index + nslots] : 0);
/*
* Step 1: return the slots to the free list, merging the slots with superceeding slots
- */
- for (i = index + nslots - 1; i >= index; i--)
- io_tlb_list[i] = ++count;
- /*
* Step 2: merge the returned slots with the preceeding slots, if available (non zero)
*/
- for (i = index - 1; (i >= 0) && io_tlb_list[i]; i--)
- io_tlb_list[i] += io_tlb_list[index];
+ for (i = index + nslots - 1; (i >= 0) && io_tlb_list[i]; i--)
+ io_tlb_list[i] = ++count;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&io_tlb_lock, flags);
}
next reply other threads:[~2000-11-15 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-15 8:15 Hirofumi Fujita [this message]
2000-11-15 14:10 ` [Linux-ia64] SW IO TLB buffer management in kernel test10 nomura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590678205720@msgid-missing \
--to=h-fujita@ebina.hitachi.co.jp \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.