From: "Jose Luu" <jluu@mainsoft.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Linux-ia64] gcc 3.0 question: ILP32 mode ?
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 19:50:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590693005928@msgid-missing> (raw)
This report http://www.linuxia64.org/gcc_summit.2001.06.06.html mentions
that:
> the HP-UX version of GCC on IA-64 supports
> ILP32 as well as LP64
Is this also available on linux gcc 3.0 ?
If not, how difficult would it be to make such a version ?
In case I want to undertake it, are the changes for HP-UX already
incorporated in the opensource tree ?
Thanks
Jose
next reply other threads:[~2001-07-26 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-26 19:50 Jose Luu [this message]
2001-07-26 20:18 ` [Linux-ia64] gcc 3.0 question: ILP32 mode ? Boehm, Hans
2001-07-26 20:19 ` Rich Altmaier
2001-07-26 22:42 ` Jose Luu
2001-07-26 23:32 ` Don Dugger
2001-07-30 22:06 ` Jes Sorensen
2001-07-30 22:15 ` Rik van Riel
2001-07-30 22:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-07-30 22:36 ` David Mosberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590693005928@msgid-missing \
--to=jluu@mainsoft.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.