From: "Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [Linux-ia64] Patch to fix latest kernels issue with FW83
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 22:57:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590698805937@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590698805927@msgid-missing>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bjorn_helgaas@hp.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 8:08 AM
> To: Mallick, Asit K; linux-ia64@linuxia64.org
> Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Patch to fix latest kernels issue with FW83
>
>
> On Thursday 24 January 2002 12:46 pm, Mallick, Asit K wrote:
> > We have root caused the stability problem with latest
> kernels and FW83
> > (LION platform). The following patch (based on 2.4.17) fixes the
> > problem.
> ...
> > - "ld4.bias r2 = [%0]\n" \
> > + "ld4 r2 = [%0]\n" \
>
> Can you elaborate on this a bit? All I know about ld.bias is
> the statement
> in section 4.4.6.1 of Vol 1 that
>
> [ld.bias] is a hint to the implementation to acquire exclusive
> ownership of the line containing the addressed data. The bias
> hint does not affect program functionality and may be ignored
> by the implementation.
This is correcnt.
>
> I can believe the patch is a performance optimization (my
> intuition is that
> when the holder writes the lock to release it, the waiter will merely
> invalidate its shared line, where it previously had to invalidate and
> copyout its exclusive line), but I don't see how this should improve
> stability. What am I missing?
FW83 does not have a workaround for a chipset issue (chipset SAC errata#2 in
460GX specification update) that could cause a livelock with ld.bias loops
and no modification. The later version of the FWs have the workaround and
will not see this problem.
Thanks,
Asit
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-25 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-24 19:46 [Linux-ia64] Patch to fix latest kernels issue with FW83 Mallick, Asit K
2002-01-25 15:11 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-01-25 16:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2002-01-25 17:29 ` Hall, Jenna S
2002-01-25 22:57 ` Mallick, Asit K [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590698805937@msgid-missing \
--to=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.