All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] new kernel patch (relative to 2.5.8-pre3)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 04:43:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590701905440@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590701905293@msgid-missing>

On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:31:04PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 20:50:35 -0700, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> said:
> 
>   Greg> There is a uhci.c (sorry, meant to say this, instead of
>   Greg> usb-uhci.c) change in the patch you just posted on kernel.org.
>   Greg> Your diffstat says there is also a change to usb-ohci.c, but
>   Greg> that doesn't show up in your patch.
> 
> This is really bugging you, eh? ;-)

Heh, yeah it is.  As the usb maintainer, I like it if people who have
patches to the subsystem let me know about it :)

>   Greg> Is there a bk tree somewhere I can clone that matches up with
>   Greg> your working tree right now?  I'd like to get that usb patch
>   Greg> out of there :)
> 
> No, the lia64 patch is a union of about a dozen bk trees.  I'm
> chipping away one tree after another, as Linus merges stuff, until at
> the end only to-linus-2.5 is left.  I did make the union tree
> available in the past, but it was a pain to maintain (it's a throwaway
> tree and bkbits.net isn't well setup to handle that, as far as I can
> tell).
> 
> Anyhow, I modified the tree containing the temporary hacks to omit the
> uhci.c change.  I'm not sure whether the comment will be gone (I
> suspect not, given bk's tendency never to forget anything), but the
> patch should be correct.

Thanks for doing this.

greg k-h


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-04-12  4:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-15  5:02 [Linux-ia64] new kernel patch (relative to 2.5.7-pre1) David Mosberger
2002-04-10 21:42 ` [Linux-ia64] new kernel patch (relative to 2.4.18) David Mosberger
2002-04-10 22:23 ` Stephane Eranian
2002-04-11 18:22 ` Chris McDermott
2002-04-11 20:04 ` Saxena, Sunil
2002-04-11 23:49 ` [Linux-ia64] new kernel patch (relative to 2.5.8-pre3) David Mosberger
2002-04-12  0:46 ` Greg KH
2002-04-12  0:49 ` David Mosberger
2002-04-12  1:01 ` Jes Sorensen
2002-04-12  1:04 ` Greg KH
2002-04-12  2:15 ` David Mosberger
2002-04-12  3:50 ` Greg KH
2002-04-12  4:43 ` Greg KH [this message]
2002-04-12  5:31 ` David Mosberger
2002-04-22  7:02 ` [Linux-ia64] new kernel patch (relative to 2.4.18) Zach, Yoav
2002-04-22 14:47 ` n0ano
2002-04-22 14:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-04-22 15:34 ` David Mosberger
2002-04-22 15:40 ` n0ano
2002-05-02 17:41 ` Steffen Persvold
2002-05-03  7:35 ` Ross Elliott
2002-05-03 17:23 ` David Mosberger
2002-05-03 23:36 ` Steffen Persvold
2002-05-08 17:49 ` David Mosberger
2002-05-08 18:25 ` Luck, Tony
2002-05-08 19:21 ` David Mosberger
2002-05-08 19:43 ` Jack Steiner
2002-05-08 20:29 ` David Mosberger
2002-05-08 23:26 ` Luck, Tony

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590701905440@msgid-missing \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.