From: "Egan Ford" <egan@sense.net>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Linux-ia64] 2.4.9 vs 2.4.18 for HPC
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 15:33:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590701905912@msgid-missing> (raw)
With respect to Itanium2 what advantages does 2.4.18 have over 2.4.9 in
an HPC environment?
My concern is that RH7.2 does not have a 2.4.18/19 kernel and probably
will not. For support reasons, running 2.4.9-34 from RH may be
required. I am curious about the possible performance and stability
issues with 2.4.9 on Itanium2.
I am trying to build a case for software development on 2.4.18/19
kernel.org kernels.
Thanks.
next reply other threads:[~2002-08-06 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-06 15:33 Egan Ford [this message]
2002-08-06 15:44 ` [Linux-ia64] 2.4.9 vs 2.4.18 for HPC Alex Williamson
2002-08-06 15:44 ` Steffen Persvold
2002-08-06 16:19 ` Mike Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590701905912@msgid-missing \
--to=egan@sense.net \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.