All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eastham, M. Thomas (Anitel Technologies)" <EasthaMT@bp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [Linux-ia64] Greater than 2TB Filesystem support?
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 19:20:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590701906025@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590701906020@msgid-missing>

Peter,
	I would be forever in you debt if you could patch 2.4.19  I can test
up to 2.5TB immediately using SGI's XFS.  This would actually be two
hardware RAID 0 arrays of 1260GB each software raid'ed together.  Our test
platform today is i386 but we hope to move to IA64 if the testing shows
promise.  If this works I hope to be able to test a 7.6TB i386 NAS box
within a few weeks.
	I'll be sure to share results with the list.

Regards,
Thomas



-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Chubb [mailto:peter@chubb.wattle.id.au]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 7:41 PM
To: davidm@hpl.hp.com
Cc: Eastham, M. Thomas (Anitel Technologies); linux-ia64@linuxia64.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Greater than 2TB Filesystem support?


>>>>> "David" = David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> writes:

>>>>> On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:18:00 -0500, "Eastham, M. Thomas (Anitel
Technologies)" <EasthaMT@bp.com> said:
Thomas> Is there anyone out there that can give me an indication of
Thomas> when the 2TB FS limitation will be addressed?  We are ready to
Thomas> implement XFS based IDE Raid IA64 servers with 4+TB today.
Thomas> Any information you can provide me about timelines would be
Thomas> very helpful.

David> Peter Chubb from the University of New South Wales has done
David> some very nice work in this regard as part of the Gelato
David> project.  He has a web page and patches for the 2.5 kernel
David> series at:

David> 	http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/~peterc/lfs.html

I'm working on a backport to 2.4; also I haven't recently updated the
2.5 IA64 port --- if you want it I can do it today and test tomorrow.

Which kernel are you interested in?

--
Dr Peter Chubb				    peterc@gelato.unsw.edu.au
You are lost in a maze of BitKeeper repositories, all almost the same.


      parent reply	other threads:[~2002-09-12 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-11 14:18 [Linux-ia64] Greater than 2TB Filesystem support? Eastham, M. Thomas (Anitel Technologies)
2002-09-11 18:03 ` David Mosberger
2002-09-12  0:41 ` Peter Chubb
2002-09-12 19:20 ` Eastham, M. Thomas (Anitel Technologies) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590701906025@msgid-missing \
    --to=easthamt@bp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.