From: "Hideki Yamamoto" <hideki@hpc.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] unalinged access by loadpair instruction
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 07:26:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709805542@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709805518@msgid-missing>
Hi David,
I have just confirmed if the kernel applied the patch
you sent.
It works fine.
Thank you so much.
End of my email
--
Yours faithfully,
Hideki Yamamoto (V).v.(V) # Empowered by Innovation
At Mon, 9 Dec 2002 18:33:38 -0800,
David Mosberger wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 14:59:30 -0800, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> said:
>
> Tony> You do recall correctly ... checking the archives, I posted a
> Tony> patch on October 16, 2001. I did fix the floating point case
> Tony> back then too ... in fact my post claims to include the patch
> Tony> for both integer and FP. But I must have attached the wrong
> Tony> patch file. I've long since deleted all my 2.4.10 trees, so
> Tony> I'd have to reconstruct from scratch (can't do it from memory,
> Tony> those neurons have been re-assigned :-(
>
> OK, it looks like the fix is pretty straight-forward. The patch below
> _should_ work, though I haven't tested it extensively.
>
> Hideki, can you try it out? BTW: I think your test program is buggy.
> The core-loop isn't right because br.ctop renames by one register
> position, not two. I attached a version of the test program which
> does what you wanted.
>
> --david
>
> === arch/ia64/kernel/unaligned.c 1.6 vs edited ==> --- 1.6/arch/ia64/kernel/unaligned.c Thu Mar 14 00:28:41 2002
> +++ edited/arch/ia64/kernel/unaligned.c Mon Dec 9 18:24:54 2002
> @@ -486,7 +486,21 @@
> DPRINT("*0x%lx=0x%lx NaT=%d new unat: %p=%lx\n", addr, val, nat, (void *) unat,*unat);
> }
>
> -#define IA64_FPH_OFFS(r) (r - IA64_FIRST_ROTATING_FR)
> +/*
> + * Return the (rotated) index for floating point register REGNUM (REGNUM must be in the
> + * range from 32-127, result is in the range from 0-95.
> + */
> +static inline unsigned long
> +fph_index (struct pt_regs *regs, long regnum)
> +{
> + unsigned long rrb_fr = (regs->cr_ifs >> 25) & 0x7f;
> +
> + regnum -= IA64_FIRST_ROTATING_FR;
> + regnum += rrb_fr;
> + if (regnum >= 96)
> + regnum -= 96;
> + return regnum;
> +}
>
> static void
> setfpreg (unsigned long regnum, struct ia64_fpreg *fpval, struct pt_regs *regs)
> @@ -507,7 +521,7 @@
> */
> if (regnum >= IA64_FIRST_ROTATING_FR) {
> ia64_sync_fph(current);
> - current->thread.fph[IA64_FPH_OFFS(regnum)] = *fpval;
> + current->thread.fph[fph_index(regs, regnum)] = *fpval;
> } else {
> /*
> * pt_regs or switch_stack ?
> @@ -566,7 +580,7 @@
> */
> if (regnum >= IA64_FIRST_ROTATING_FR) {
> ia64_flush_fph(current);
> - *fpval = current->thread.fph[IA64_FPH_OFFS(regnum)];
> + *fpval = current->thread.fph[fph_index(regs, regnum)];
> } else {
> /*
> * f0 = 0.0, f1= 1.0. Those registers are constant and are thus
> ----------------------------------------------------
> #define n 100
>
> double d[n],d2[n+1];
>
> main() {
> int i,j;
>
> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> d[i] = i;
> d2[i] = 0.0;
> }
> copy_by_loadpair(&d, &d2, n/2-1);
> for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> if (d2[i] != i)
> printf("d2[%d] = %f, should be d[%d]=%f\n",
> i, d2[i], i, d[i]);
> }
> }
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> .file "a.c"
> .pred.safe_across_calls p1-p5,p16-p63
> .text
> .align 16
> .global copy_by_loadpair
> .proc copy_by_loadpair
> copy_by_loadpair:
> alloc r8=ar.pfs,3,6,0,0 ;;
> mov r15=r32
> mov r2=r33
> add r3=8,r33
> mov ar.lc=r34
> mov pr.rot=0x10000
> mov ar.ec=5 ;;
> L1:
> (p16) ldfpd f32,f37=[r15],16
> (p20) stfd [r2]ó6,16
> (p20) stfd [r3]ô1,16
> br.ctop.sptk L1;;
> br.ret.sptk.many b0 ;;
> .endp get_by_loadpair
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-IA64 mailing list
> Linux-IA64@linuxia64.org
> http://lists.linuxia64.org/lists/listinfo/linux-ia64
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-11 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-09 14:28 [Linux-ia64] unalinged access by loadpair instruction Hideki Yamamoto
2002-12-09 21:41 ` David Mosberger
2002-12-09 22:59 ` Luck, Tony
2002-12-10 2:33 ` David Mosberger
2002-12-10 11:12 ` Hideki Yamamoto
2002-12-10 12:18 `
2002-12-11 7:26 ` Hideki Yamamoto [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590709805542@msgid-missing \
--to=hideki@hpc.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.