From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Linux-ia64] Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] Problem with pci_read_config_word_nodev in 2.4.20
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 05:12:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709805559@msgid-missing> (raw)
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 03:05:33AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> I'm trying to get the acpiphp driver going on an HP system.
> Unfortunately, it crashes the machine on zx1 systems due to uninitialised
> sysdata. I'm using the 2.4.20 patch from Bjorn, plus the 0.4 acpiphp
> driver that was submitted for 2.4.21.
>
> Here's the problem:
>
> acpiphp_enable_slot()
> |-> enable_device()
> |-> acpiphp_configure_slot()
> |-> pci_read_config_byte_nodev()
> |-> build_dev()
> |-> pci_read_config_byte(dev)
> |-> dev->bus->ops->read_byte()
>
> And the zx1 read_byte operation attempts to dereference a struct which
> sysdata points to. But build_dev() doesn't fill in sysdata, and it has
> no easy way to get it.
Um, didn't we go over all of this a few weeks ago? :)
In the end, yes, it's a problem. And yes, I'd like to fix it. But I
haven't gotten a patch from anyone that fixes this correctly. The only
one I've seen that is halfway sane just sets sysdata to 0, but that
only works on one machine type :)
> I really don't know the best way to fix this. Part of me says to fix
> the _nodev() API to take a struct pci_bus *. Part of me says that's too
> big for 2.4 and not necessary for 2.5. So maybe we should stash the sysdata
> in the acpiphp_bridge.
Yes, for 2.5 this is not a problem. The _nodev() functions are big
already, we could merge slot and function together to devfn, and then
add another argument if we want to keep it at 6 paramaters...
Any other ideas are welcome.
thanks,
greg k-h
reply other threads:[~2002-12-13 5:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590709805559@msgid-missing \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.