All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@sgi.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Pre-emption patch for IA-64
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 21:32:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709806116@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590709806101@msgid-missing>

Just FYI, I tried 2.5.64 out on my Bug Sur, and it seems to work ok
with the following exceptions:
  o the AT keyboard support seems broken (characters are slow to show
    up on the screen and are sometimes repeated)
  o agp support for 460GX causes a link failure

But by using a USB keyboard and turning off agp support, I was able to
get an SMP+preempt kernel going, and it seems fine.

Jesse

On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 01:24:44PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote:
> Peter Chubb has been working on adding preemption support to 2.5.  I
> applied his patch in the 2.5.64 patch.  I'm sure he would appreciate
> more people beating on it.
> 
> 	--david
> 
> >>>>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 11:21:21 -0600, Mario Smarduch <cms063@email.mot.com> said:
> 
>   Mario> Hi, we're trying to build a reliable low-latency system for
>   Mario> use in telco call processing carrier grade environments (on
>   Mario> rx2600 NEBS like servers) . One of the patches we're heavily
>   Mario> relying on is the 'Kernel Preemption' patch. First of we're
>   Mario> interested in the (i) status of this patch on IA-64 (ii) any
>   Mario> issues that you may have ran into.
> 
>   Mario> Our understanding is that the 'Preemption Patch' offers a
>   Mario> systematic scheduling checkpoint vs. 'low latency patch'
>   Mario> which examines the kernel for any long running code and based
>   Mario> on that preemption checks are inserted in the kernel proper
>   Mario> only (kernel.org) but addon packages may introduce long
>   Mario> latencies. While we plan to run with 1mS clock tick, low
>   Mario> latency and the preemption paches, the preemption patch is
>   Mario> viewed as a must to gurantee a bound on 'soft-realtime
>   Mario> response'.  Please point out if these assumption are somewhat
>   Mario> correct or is too much emphasis being placed on the
>   Mario> preemption patch, the soft-realtime response we're looking
>   Mario> for is 1mS.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-IA64 mailing list
> Linux-IA64@linuxia64.org
> http://lists.linuxia64.org/lists/listinfo/linux-ia64


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-03-14 21:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-14 17:21 [Linux-ia64] Pre-emption patch for IA-64 Mario Smarduch
2003-03-14 21:24 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-14 21:32 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2003-03-14 21:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-03-14 21:57 ` Peter Chubb
2003-03-14 22:07 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-14 22:41 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-03-17 18:11 ` jim
2003-03-27 23:31 ` Mario Smarduch
2003-03-27 23:33 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-03-28  3:58 ` Peter Chubb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590709806116@msgid-missing \
    --to=jbarnes@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.