From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] provide /proc/sal/itc_drift through AUX?
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 23:54:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705275@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705273@msgid-missing>
>>>>> On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:39:31 -0500, Jes Sorensen <jes@wildopensource.com> said:
Jes> Hi I was wondering what people think about providing the
Jes> information of /proc/sal/itc_drift as an AUX vector?
Jes> The problem is that on some NUMA boxen (such as the SGI boxes),
Jes> the ITC isn't synchronized across nodes and we can't rely on
Jes> ar.itc in userland for implementing the high-precision
Jes> timing. I believe the IBM NUMA-Q team has a similar problem
Jes> that could be solved in a similar way on ia32?
Jes> Instead one can switch to using gettimeofday() for the timing,
Jes> which with the new fast syscalls should be quite pleasant.
Jes> I have a patch which implements this for glibc-2.2 (will do 2.3
Jes> later), however what I don't like about it is that one ends up
Jes> opening and reading /proc/sal/itc_drift in every single binary
Jes> executed. To avoid the overhead of this it seems a good idea to
Jes> me to provide this information via an AUX vector.
Jes> If anybody is interested in the glibc patch, feel free to grab
Jes> it from
Jes> http://www.wildopensource.com/~jes/glibc/itc-drift-patch.diff
Jes> For now it's a test patch, though it does seem to behave as
Jes> expected.
Jes> Thoughts?
Why do you need to export it if you just use a light-weight
gettimeofday()? The light-weight syscall can readily access the
ITC-drift info via kernel memory.
BTW: I think someone should explore using an NTP-like approach to keep
ITC drift small enough that it's still usable for ITC-based
interpolation. Granted, this assumes that hw drifts are reasonably
small and you'd still need to worry about different clock-frequencies,
but I suspect that in practice, this would work extremely well. It
would be nice because it would be much faster than an HPET-based
approach, would work on all ia64 machines, and would provide better
resolution. Furthermore, we already have all the logic in the
time-interpolation to ensure that there is never an observable time
discontinuity.
--david
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-19 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-19 21:39 [Linux-ia64] provide /proc/sal/itc_drift through AUX? Jes Sorensen
2003-03-19 23:54 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2003-03-20 2:06 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-03-20 19:57 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-20 23:55 ` Rich Altmaier
2003-03-21 0:43 ` David Mosberger
2003-03-21 2:04 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-03-21 17:49 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590723705275@msgid-missing \
--to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.