All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Duraid Madina <duraid@octopus.com.au>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] Re: Itanium gets supercomputing software
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 22:54:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705484@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705464@msgid-missing>

David Mosberger wrote:
>>>>>>On Sat, 12 Apr 2003 06:49:35 +1000, Duraid Madina <duraid@octopus.com.au> said:
> 
>   Duraid> My point wasn't that software simulators are useless, but
>   Duraid> that software simulators _should_ be useless **4 years**
>   Duraid> (!!) after the public availability of hardware.
> 
> Then how do you explain the popularity of user-mode linux on x86?

If user-mode linux is "popular", then linux is "f@#%g buggy s#!t". I 
mean really, when your attitude to software development is:

	<Linus> hey somethings wrong my swap is full what gives????
	<Rik Riel> stop running 91589 copies of XMMS 8)
	<Linus> shut up riel god i hate you
	** Riel is banned from linux-kernel
	<Andrea> YO CHECK OUT THE NEW VM SYSTEM I WROTE THIS 
MORNING^H^H^H^H^H^H^HWEEK!! ITLL FIX YOUR PROBLEMS!!!!
	<Linus> k i know 2.4 is supposed to be a "stable" kernel but god i hate 
that riel dude!! :| welp.. out with the old, in with the new!!!!!
	** Linus integrates new VM
	<Andrea> THANKS D00D
	<Linus> no probs m8

	..then yes, having UML as a sandbox can help.

The UML guys see it differently though. According to them: "It doesn't 
need to be good for anything. It's fun!" Maybe Ski can embrace this 
spirit also. ;)

  > The reason I continue to use Ski is because it's one of the very few
> simulators out there that are (a) architecturally extremely accurate,
> (b) fast, and (c) very easy to setup & use.  Ski is an asset for ia64
> linux, not a weakness.
> 
> (And no, just because we have Ski doesn't mean we don't use real
>  hardware.  Nothing could be further from the truth.)

That's right - _you_ use real hardware because you actually have it. 
Everyone else (figuratively speaking, though it's not far off the mark) 
has no choice _but_ to use Ski. That sucks, regardless of whether or not 
Ski is accurate, fast, or easy to use.

Anyway, I don't think there's much more that can be said. As Matt 
indicated, we must pray for Deerfield, so I will continue to align my 
holy carpet of hope to Fort Collins/Portland/Carly's hotel bedroom and 
pray for reasonably priced IA64 hardware.

	Duraid



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-04-11 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-11  7:51 [Linux-ia64] Re: Itanium gets supercomputing software David Kågedal
2003-04-11 20:49 ` Duraid Madina
2003-04-11 22:08 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-11 22:54 ` Duraid Madina [this message]
2003-04-11 23:05 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-12 15:50 ` David Kågedal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590723705484@msgid-missing \
    --to=duraid@octopus.com.au \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.