All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Adriano Galano" <adriano@satec.es>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [Linux-ia64] benchmarking results
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 09:08:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705635@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705621@msgid-missing>

Hi Steve:

> > >>>>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:17:45 +0200, "Adriano Galano"
> <adriano@satec.es> said:
> >
> >   Adriano> We need to find some reference of SMP
> scalability on Linux
> >   Adriano> scheduler. For 1, 2, 4 and 8 processor. How "lineal" is
> >   Adriano> this scalability? Does Linux perform well en 4
> or 8 Itanium
> >   Adriano> 2 architecture?
> >
> > David Mosberger wrote:
> > There is no single answer to the scalability question.  It totally
> > depends on what application you're running.  SGI has shown that
> > certain apps scale very nicely all the way to 64 CPUs on their Altix
> > box.  Kernel-intensive apps won't scale that far, but even
> there there
> > is some evendice of very nice scaling.  ...
>
> Hi Adriano,
>
> As David points out, there's a lot of factors that can affect
> scalability
> results for a particular workload.  If you haven't already,
> you might want
> to check out the following from the February 2003 issue of
> Linux Journal
> magazine: http://linuxjournal.com/article.php?sidd40, which
> provides more
> background on the SGI Altix system along with some scaling
> and benchmark results.
>

Thanks for the reference.

Maybe in all the cases I can see NUMA architectures and not find references
related to what kind of scheduler was used older sched, O(1) or HT? The
limits of the bricks for SMP are 4 proc, how could I assume linear
scalability for 8 proc having memory latency accesing the others bricks
through R-Brick maybe?

Regards,

-Adriano

> Hope that helps.
>
> --steve



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-05-05  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-30 10:54 [Linux-ia64] benchmarking results Adriano Galano
2003-04-30 11:15 ` Duraid Madina
2003-04-30 16:13 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-30 16:17 ` Adriano Galano
2003-04-30 17:33 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-30 18:08 ` Steve Neuner
2003-05-05  9:08 ` Adriano Galano [this message]
2003-05-05 15:46 ` Steve Neuner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590723705635@msgid-missing \
    --to=adriano@satec.es \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.