All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.72 for ia64 released
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 21:04:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105614315629417@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105605890319553@msgid-missing>


    Jesse> Yeah, that's what I meant.  Jack's patch to 2.4 has been
    Jesse> tested on sn2, DIG, zx1, NEC, and Bull machines, as a generic
    Jesse> kernel for the first three at least (don't know what NEC and
    Jesse> Bull did for their testing).

  David> But which ones are NUMA with node-scattered physical memory?  sn2 for
  David> sure.  DIG, zx1 are not, for sure.  I'm not certain about NEC or Bull.
  David> So I'm not convinced that it works for all possible physical memory
  David> layouts.



Takayoshi tested it on an NEC numa system & had no problems with the final
version of the patch.. The memory map for his system was:

	mem00: type=4, attr=0x9, range=[0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000001000) (0MB)
	mem01: type=7, attr=0x9, range=[0x0000000000001000-0x0000000000088000) (0MB)
	mem02: type=4, attr=0x9, range=[0x0000000000088000-0x00000000000a0000) (0MB)
	...
	mem67: type=4, attr=0x9, range=[0x000000041f90d000-0x000000041f9fe000) (0MB)
	mem68: type=7, attr=0x9, range=[0x000000041f9fe000-0x000000041fda4000) (3MB)
	mem69: type=5, attr=0x8000000000000009, range=[0x000000041fda4000-0x000000041fe10000) (0MB)
	mem70: type=7, attr=0x9, range=[0x000000041fe10000-0x000000041ffb2000) (1MB)
	mem71: type=6, attr=0x8000000000000009, range=[0x000000041ffb2000-0x0000000420000000) (0MB)
	mem72: type\x12, attr=0x8000000000000001, range=[0x00000ffffc000000-0x0000100000000000) (64MB)

	SRAT revision 1
	SRAT Processor (id[0x60] eid[0x00]) in proximity domain 6 enabled
	SRAT Processor (id[0x61] eid[0x00]) in proximity domain 6 enabled
	SRAT Processor (id[0x62] eid[0x00]) in proximity domain 6 enabled
	SRAT Processor (id[0x63] eid[0x00]) in proximity domain 6 enabled
	SRAT Processor (id[0x70] eid[0x00]) in proximity domain 7 enabled
	SRAT Processor (id[0x71] eid[0x00]) in proximity domain 7 enabled
	SRAT Processor (id[0x72] eid[0x00]) in proximity domain 7 enabled
	SRAT Processor (id[0x73] eid[0x00]) in proximity domain 7 enabled
	SRAT Memory (0x0000000000000000 length 0x000000000009fc00 type 0x1) in proximity domain 6 enabled
	SRAT Memory (0x0000000000100000 length 0x00000001fff00000 type 0x1) in proximity domain 6 enabled
	SRAT Memory (0x0000000200000000 length 0x0000000200000000 type 0x1) in proximity domain 7 enabled
	SRAT Memory (0x0000000400000000 length 0x0000000020000000 type 0x1) in proximity domain 6 enabled


This testing was on the 2.4.20 version of the patch but I think the 2.5 version is the same - at
least as far as the memmap is concerned.

I dont know if the BULL system was numa but they verified the final version of
the 2.4.20 patch.

No guarantee that it works for everything though...
	



-- 
Thanks

Jack Steiner    (651-683-5302)   (vnet 233-5302)      steiner@sgi.com


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-06-20 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-19 21:39 2.5.72 for ia64 released David Mosberger
2003-06-20 11:38 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-06-20 17:11 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-06-20 17:47 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-06-20 18:01 ` David Mosberger
2003-06-20 18:35 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-06-20 18:41 ` David Mosberger
2003-06-20 18:45 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-06-20 18:49 ` David Mosberger
2003-06-20 18:50 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-06-20 18:53 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-06-20 19:02 ` David Mosberger
2003-06-20 19:07 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-06-20 19:44 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-06-20 19:49 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-06-20 19:51 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-06-20 19:56 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-06-20 20:03 ` Alex Tsariounov
2003-06-20 20:06 ` David Mosberger
2003-06-20 20:25 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-06-20 20:28 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-06-20 20:34 ` David Mosberger
2003-06-20 20:39 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-06-20 20:40 ` Andreas Schwab
2003-06-20 20:50 ` David Mosberger
2003-06-20 20:51 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-06-20 21:04 ` Jack Steiner [this message]
2003-06-20 21:06 ` David Mosberger
2003-06-20 21:21 ` Jesse Barnes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105614315629417@msgid-missing \
    --to=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.