From: Christopher Wedgwood <cw@sgi.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] (2.4.x bk) efi_memmap_walk_uc
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 02:58:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105884272104553@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105883467032028@msgid-missing>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 08:16:04PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> I sort of object to adding a parallel function just to extract
> regions with a different attribute.
As do I.
> I'd rather rework efi_memmap_walk to call the callback for *every*
> memory descriptor, and make the callback responsible for filtering
> out the regions of interest.
I'd prefer we cleaned up the entire EFI code to do this and a few
other things differently --- however, given the status of 2.4.x I'm
not sure this is desirable?
> The only problem is that the existing callbacks would have to be
> changed. Plus, all the trimming that's currently in efi_memmap_walk
> to make sure all the granules with WB memory are completely WB,
> would have to be reworked or pulled out into its own function. I
> kind of like the idea of factoring it out anyway.
Given that is this acceptable for 2.4.x as-is or should I move the
code into the driver as distasteful as that is.
I'm not convinced that massive EFI API changes right now are a good
idea (not to mention I certainly have no time for them myself).
Thanks,
--cw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-22 2:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-22 0:43 [PATCH] (2.4.x bk) efi_memmap_walk_uc Christopher Wedgwood
2003-07-22 2:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-07-22 2:58 ` Christopher Wedgwood [this message]
2003-07-22 3:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-07-22 4:43 ` Christopher Wedgwood
2003-07-25 1:15 ` David Mosberger
2003-07-29 18:34 ` Christopher Wedgwood
2003-07-29 18:45 ` Luck, Tony
2003-07-29 19:03 ` Christopher Wedgwood
2003-07-29 20:41 ` David Mosberger
2003-07-29 21:15 ` Christopher Wedgwood
2003-07-29 21:31 ` David Mosberger
2003-07-29 21:34 ` Luck, Tony
2003-07-29 22:05 ` Jack Steiner
2003-07-29 22:07 ` Christopher Wedgwood
2003-07-29 22:26 ` Luck, Tony
2003-07-29 22:30 ` David Mosberger
2003-07-29 22:35 ` Christopher Wedgwood
2003-07-29 22:37 ` Christopher Wedgwood
2003-07-29 22:47 ` Luck, Tony
2003-07-29 22:48 ` David Mosberger
2003-07-29 22:54 ` David Mosberger
2003-07-29 23:49 ` Jack Steiner
2003-07-29 23:54 ` Christopher Wedgwood
2003-07-29 23:56 ` Jack Steiner
2003-07-30 0:00 ` Christopher Wedgwood
2003-07-30 0:02 ` Christopher Wedgwood
2003-07-30 0:05 ` David Mosberger
2003-07-30 0:12 ` David Mosberger
2003-07-30 0:22 ` Jack Steiner
2003-07-30 9:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105884272104553@msgid-missing \
--to=cw@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.