From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: CPUSET Proposal
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 06:59:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-106447332309231@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-106444308519469@msgid-missing>
At some point in the past, I wrote:
>> It's meant to flatten the hierarchy ...
>> ...
>> The hierarchy is meant to be there, just ...
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:51:20PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> _What_ is meant to flatten the hierarchy ?? To what does "It" refer ??
> So is the hierarchy of CKRM there or not -- you've confused me.
> And in any case, are we in agreement that any such CKRM hierarchy
> is not isomorphic to the cpuset hierarchy?
The numerical share assignments.
I don't have the intestinal fortitude to pore over the pronouns used
in the last message.
The hierarchy used in CKRM is there.
I don't know if the CKRM hierarchy is different from yours or not.
It's a subgraph of the process inheritance hierarchy.
At any rate, I'll hope my little request to have similar mechanisms
consolidated is heeded somehow and bow out at this point.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-25 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-24 22:26 [Lse-tech] Re: CPUSET Proposal Hanna Linder
2003-09-25 5:39 ` Paul Jackson
2003-09-25 5:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-09-25 6:09 ` Paul Jackson
2003-09-25 6:23 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-09-25 6:38 ` Paul Jackson
2003-09-25 6:44 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-09-25 6:51 ` Paul Jackson
2003-09-25 6:59 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-09-25 7:11 ` Paul Jackson
2003-09-25 13:11 ` Hubertus Franke
2003-09-25 13:19 ` Hubertus Franke
2003-09-25 13:21 ` Hubertus Franke
2003-09-25 13:26 ` Simon Derr
2003-09-25 16:50 ` Dave Hansen
2003-09-25 18:49 ` Luck, Tony
2003-09-25 20:28 ` Yu, Fenghua
2003-09-26 7:17 ` Sylvain Jeaugey
2003-09-26 7:47 ` Sylvain Jeaugey
2003-09-26 12:57 ` Hubertus Franke
2003-09-26 13:29 ` Hubertus Franke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-106447332309231@msgid-missing \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.