All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IA64 ino_t incorrectly sized?
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 16:59:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-106623784528803@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-106378281914262@msgid-missing>

>>>>> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 22:18:10 -0700, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> said:

  Andrew> David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com> wrote:

  >>  NFS is nastier (ugly multiplexed syscalls...).

  Andrew> Well I think that whole interface is deprecated anyway and
  Andrew> the new nfsutils doesn't use it - it uses exportfs instead.

  Andrew> You'd need to check with Neil, but if I'm right you could
  Andrew> just say "use current nfsutils on ia64".

Ugh, looks like there may be some problems with exportfs itself?
I see:

static struct dentry *get_object(struct super_block *sb, void *vobjp)
{
	__u32 *objp = vobjp;
	unsigned long ino = objp[0];
	__u32 generation = objp[1];

	return export_iget(sb, ino, generation);
}

So it looks to me like exportfs supports only 32-bit ino_t?

(Neil, to give you some background: we'd like to change ino_t on ia64
from 32 to 64 bits and found that the only potential ABI issue is due
to NFS; "struct nfsctl_export" is definitely an issue, but perhaps we
can live with that.  I'm less certain about any issues exportfs might
have.)

	--david

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-10-15 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-17  7:10 IA64 ino_t incorrectly sized? Nathan Scott
2003-09-17 14:33 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-09-17 17:26 ` David Mosberger
2003-09-29  5:52 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-08 23:51 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-09  1:25 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-09  1:57 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-09  3:15 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-09  3:53 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-09  4:55 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-09 20:46 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-10  2:22 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-15  1:25 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-15  1:48 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-15  4:47 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-15  5:18 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-15  6:06 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-15  6:16 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-15  6:21 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-15  6:28 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-15  6:34 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-15 12:42 ` Andi Kleen
2003-10-15 12:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-10-15 13:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-10-15 13:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-10-15 16:32 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-15 16:59 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2003-10-15 17:40 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-15 23:40 ` Neil Brown
2003-10-16  1:20 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-16 22:47 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-17  0:47 ` Neil Brown
2003-10-17  1:56 ` Nathan Scott
2003-10-21  3:37 ` Neil Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-106623784528803@msgid-missing \
    --to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.