From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] prevent "dd if=/dev/mem" crash
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 22:40:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-106643054216291@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-106642876514553@msgid-missing>
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> writes:
>> I expect there are probably different opinions about the idea
>> that "dd if=/dev/mem" exits without doing anything. Sparc and
>> 68K have nearby code that bit-buckets writes and returns zeroes
>> for reads of page zero. We could do that, too, but it seems like
>> kind of a hack, and holes on ia64 can be BIG (on the order of
>> 256GB for one box).
>
> Filling in the holes does seem like a bad idea, but so does returning
> EOF when you hit a hole (which is what I think your patch is doing).
>
> Would ENODEV be better?
EIO would probably fit better.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-17 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-17 22:10 [RFC] prevent "dd if=/dev/mem" crash Bjorn Helgaas
2003-10-17 22:19 ` Luck, Tony
2003-10-17 22:23 ` Matt Mackall
2003-10-17 22:40 ` Andreas Schwab [this message]
2003-10-17 22:50 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-17 23:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-10-17 23:55 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-18 0:15 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-18 0:21 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-18 0:49 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-18 1:31 ` Matt Chapman
2003-10-18 1:41 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-18 1:48 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-18 2:01 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-18 2:01 ` Matt Chapman
2003-10-19 11:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-10-19 18:17 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-19 19:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-20 15:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-10-20 17:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-10-20 18:48 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-23 8:33 ` Martin Pool
2003-10-23 9:31 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2003-10-23 21:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-17 22:10 Bjorn Helgaas
2003-10-17 22:23 ` Matt Mackall
2003-10-17 22:50 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-17 23:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-10-17 23:55 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-18 0:15 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-18 0:21 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-18 0:49 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-18 1:31 ` Matt Chapman
2003-10-18 1:41 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-18 1:48 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-18 2:01 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-18 2:01 ` Matt Chapman
2003-10-19 11:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2003-10-19 19:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-20 15:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-10-20 18:48 ` David Mosberger
2003-10-20 17:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-10-23 21:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-10-19 18:17 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-23 8:33 ` Martin Pool
2003-10-23 9:31 ` Zoltan Menyhart
2003-10-17 22:19 Luck, Tony
2003-10-17 22:40 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-106643054216291@msgid-missing \
--to=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.