From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.4.23-pre9_ia64-cyclone_A0
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 01:02:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-106911773504950@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-106911773604958@msgid-missing>
[Resent to the proper mailing list]
On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 16:23, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Friday 14 November 2003 6:24 pm, john stultz wrote:
> > This patch was developed for the distros to support the cyclone time
> > source on IBM x455 systems. x455 systems are multi-node NUMA systems
> > which suffer from unsynced ITCs, which can cause non-monotonically
> > increasing results from gettimeofday(). Very similar code was
> > implemented in the i386 arch to resolve the same issue on x440s.
> > ...
> > Any comments or feedback would be appreciated.
>
> There's a generic infrastructure for this in 2.5:
> http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/cset@1.1046.203.22?nav=index.html|src/.|src/include|src/include/linux|related/include/linux/timex.h
Yep, I'm looking at exactly that for my 2.5 patch. But thanks for the
pointer.
> SGI uses a similar design in 2.4, but apparently there are some
> issues with it:
> http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/linux-ia64/0310/6973.html
>
> I'd like to see those issues resolved and the Cyclone support
> put into the same framework as the SGI work.
Hmmm. I think I've grasped the issue there. It seems the problem is not
calculating the equivalent of delay_at_last_interrupt found in the i386
time code. I'll see if I cannot come up with something similar.
Also I'd definitely like to share more infrastructure w/ the SN2 folks,
is there a pointer to their 2.4 gettimeoffset() patch around?
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-18 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-18 1:01 [RFC][PATCH] linux-2.4.23-pre9_ia64-cyclone_A0 john stultz
2003-11-18 1:02 ` john stultz [this message]
2003-11-18 1:08 ` john stultz
2003-11-18 16:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2003-11-18 18:44 ` john stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-106911773504950@msgid-missing \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.