From: Adam Wiggins <adam@angel.com>
To: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AWE64 initial questions
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 18:59:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-sound-90554118024934@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-sound-90515879913606@msgid-missing>
On Fri, 11 Sep 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> What's wrong with isapnptools? Works fine for me. Setting up /etc/isapnp.conf
> is a bit harder than letting Windows do it for you, but Linux is general
> requires more intelligence than 95/98 at present. As a result, you get
> more flexibility; isapnp doesn't care where you stick your hardware, while
> Windows will do everything it can to stop you manually allocating machine
> resources.
>
> To me, Linux uses isapnp just like software setup of ethernet cards; it lets
> me pick where to put hardware without changing jumpers, rather than allocating
> it where it THINKS it fits.
I agree pnpdump/isapnp is a snap to use once you get used to it, but it's
pretty difficult at the start when you just want to get your sound card
working.
At the moment I think a little shell script which worked like xf86config
or even the kernel "make config" would be a big improvement. Ie, it just
seds the pnpdump file and gives you options:
% pnpsetup
Detected: "Creative Labs PnP Sound Chip"
Use this device? (y/n) y
What IO base? (220, 240, 260, 280, 2A0, 300) 280
What IRQ? (5, 7, 9, 10, 11) 10
Etc. With a little bit of smarts it could keep track of which irqs were
already in use (and check /proc/pci to not overlap with non-isa pnp
stuff) and warn of conflicts. This would be highly useful to a person who
is perfectly familiar with setting up their sound blaster to run DOS games
- a "computer person" without being a unix wizard, who is probably Linux's
biggest potential target audience right now.
I'd do it myself if I could program shell scripts worth a damn. Or does
something like this already exist?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-09-11 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-09-07 3:18 AWE64 initial questions Dave Wreski
1998-09-08 20:06 ` Emil Stephan
1998-09-09 5:02 ` Dave Wreski
1998-09-09 14:39 ` Maddog Abel
1998-09-09 15:03 ` Juan Lupion
1998-09-09 19:40 ` Emil Stephan
1998-09-09 20:03 ` Dave Wreski
1998-09-09 21:03 ` Bill Nottingham
1998-09-09 22:13 ` Dan Hollis
1998-09-10 3:10 ` Dave Wreski
1998-09-10 16:23 ` Juan Lupion
1998-09-10 22:51 ` Dave Wreski
1998-09-10 23:22 ` Dan Hollis
1998-09-11 9:29 ` Hamish Moffatt
1998-09-11 9:31 ` Hamish Moffatt
1998-09-11 14:16 ` Dave Wreski
1998-09-11 18:59 ` Adam Wiggins [this message]
1998-09-12 10:11 ` Hamish Moffatt
1998-09-12 19:54 ` rtlynch
1998-09-13 0:51 ` Dave Wreski
1998-09-13 2:04 ` Jim
1998-09-13 2:11 ` llornkcor
1998-09-14 18:51 ` Adam Wiggins
1998-09-14 20:09 ` Dave Wreski
1998-09-15 15:14 ` rtlynch
1998-09-16 1:39 ` Bill Nottingham
1998-09-19 12:59 ` Hamish Moffatt
1998-09-19 13:01 ` Hamish Moffatt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-sound-90554118024934@msgid-missing \
--to=adam@angel.com \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.