All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Leif Rasmussen <plr@cedara.com>
To: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: motherboard/cpu combo for sound
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 20:09:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-sound-95135030506271@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-sound-95131303730224@msgid-missing>

If price wasn't a problem for sure I would go with an SMP system, and with
the AbitBP6(?) motherboard you can even get an economic dual Celeron system.
Linux 2.4 will have a vastly improved SMP functionality and stability and
without knowing particular details I would expect multiple CPUs to handle
time critical pieces better than one CPU that must deal with everything, eg.
sound recording.

Otherwise I agree that an Athlon system now is the way to go, and I would
rather go with that than a single CPU Celeron. In any case, when you have
set your budget and found out how much you want to spend on the mobo+CPU
subsystem, if comparing Celeron and Athlon, the Athlon is faster for the
same CPU-speed and I don't know of any issues with regard to sound (the
Athlon has/had some issues with some video-cards as far as I remember).

In any case, anything but Celeron and Athlon should be avoided due to both
pure performance and price/performance issues.

Peter

Paco wrote:
> 
> On 23 Feb 2000, Laura Conrad wrote:
> 
> >
> > I'm going to be upgrading my machine soon.  I wondered if there's
> > anyone here who follows the hardware market better than I do, and has
> > an opinion about what's a good buy at the moment.
> >
> > I'd also be interested in what people would get if price were no
> > object, although that isn't exactly the case with me.  And in
> > predictions about how much better a machine I can get for less in 6
> > months.
> 
> Well... if price is not an object then I'd load up with a nice fat 1GHz
> Athlon.  (You'll need to wait about a month or so to get one.)  As far as
> waiting goes, you'll be able to pick up a 800MHz Athlon in about a month
> for less than I paid for my 550MHz one month ago.
> 
> But... if price *is* an object, and you're looking for bang-for-the-buck,
> I'd suggest a celeron (although I despise Intel) or an AMD K6-II or
> K6-III.  I previously used a K6-II-350 and it worked GREAT for hard disk
> recording.  Midi?  I don;t know anything about that.  I never use it.
> 
> regards,
> -Paco

  parent reply	other threads:[~2000-02-23 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-02-23 12:59 motherboard/cpu combo for sound Laura Conrad
2000-02-23 18:53 ` Paco
2000-02-23 20:09 ` Peter Leif Rasmussen [this message]
2000-02-24 15:57 ` Brian Alexander Todd
2000-04-17 17:36 ` Laura Conrad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-sound-95135030506271@msgid-missing \
    --to=plr@cedara.com \
    --cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.