From: "Dustin Barlow" <dbarlow@omnids.com>
To: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Multimedia compression
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 22:28:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-sound-96200429928836@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-sound-96126686903146@msgid-missing>
I will second Paco's synopsis of Shorten.
I have close to 100 concerts that were compressed using the lossless setting
in Shorten, and they are *exact* copies of the original when decompressed.
You can do an md5sum of the wav file prior to compressing it and it will
match after it is uncompressed later on.
I can typically cut a wave file size in half and it is lossless...I don't
think you
can ask for more then that...at least not yet anyway. I have not tried to
do lossy compression with Shorten so I cannot comment on it's performance
in the lossy realm...
Another thing is that WinShorten *will* stream shorten files so that you do
not have to convert them to wav to listen to them. I setup a machine to
do that very thing so that I didn't have to burn my extensive SHN library
to audio CDR or wav file prior to listening. I haven't found a streaming
version of Shorten for linux, so I grabbed the source code the other day
and am looking into what it would take to do it...shouldn't be to difficult.
~Db
----- Original Message -----
From: <paco@hydrofunk.org>
To: Benno Senoner <sbenno@gardena.net>
Cc: Sergey <harlot@mail.ru>; <linux-sound@vger.rutgers.edu>;
<linux-audio-dev@ginette.musique.umontreal.ca>; John Lazzaro
<lazzaro@CS.Berkeley.EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 12:08 PM
Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Multimedia compression
> On Sat, 17 Jun 2000, Benno Senoner wrote:
>
> > I tried shorten some time ago:
> >
> > OTOH, when using lossless compression the gain is sometime minimal,
> > only 20% if you are unlucky.
> > Not much for my taste.
>
> I find this very hard to believe. Speaking from my own experience, I've
> had nothing but outstanding results with SHORTEN.
>
> I collect live concert bootlegs; recorded on DAT, dumped down onto the
> HDD as WAVs, compressed to SHNs, and burned onto CDs that I listen to.
> I've got nearly 100 such CDs sitting here at my side, and here's the
> stats based on those live concert CDs.
>
> My average song compression 52% savings
> My worst single-song comression 35% savings
> My best single-song compression 60% savings
>
> The main thing I wanted to point out is that I've never had a something
> compress less than 35%.
>
> peace,
> -Paco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-06-20 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-06-17 18:33 [linux-audio-dev] Re: Multimedia compression John Lazzaro
2000-06-19 18:50 ` Juhana Sadeharju
2000-06-20 11:54 ` Benno Senoner
2000-06-20 22:28 ` Dustin Barlow [this message]
2000-06-20 22:40 ` paco
2000-06-20 23:02 ` paco
2000-06-20 23:04 ` paco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-sound-96200429928836@msgid-missing \
--to=dbarlow@omnids.com \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.