From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "von Essen, Matthias" <VON_ESSEN@ntn04.FEV.de>
Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 09:10:55 +0000
Subject: Re: mirror of ultrapenguin
Message-Id: <marc-linux-ultrasparc-90222356531005@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <ultralinux.vger.kernel.org>
References: <marc-linux-ultrasparc-90222356530986@msgid-missing>
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ultrasparc-90222356530986@msgid-missing>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: ultralinux@vger.kernel.org




>  > I think we must heavily promote Ultra-Penguin 1.0.9 for sun4c and
> sun4m
>  > or give it another name.
>  >=20
> what about sparc-linux RH5.1 ;-)
> (When Donnie gets around to get it together -- they don=B4t have any
> Ultra=B4s at RH is the main thing holding it up :-(
>=20
> wes
>=20
The name you propose is absolutely o.k. IMHO we should all test it
critically and post any probs to the ultralinux list. It seems to me
rather calm there.

Only a stable RH 5.1 for sparc should be released, we should not make
the same mistake as MS does it with windoze95, -98, -01 ???

-Mathias