From: "Nicholas S. Wourms" <nwourms@dialup.dstm.com>
To: ultralinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RedHat 6.0 runs on UltraSPARC?
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 14:51:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ultrasparc-92531136302593@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ultrasparc-92530848032119@msgid-missing>
I hope that Ultra Linux will continue, in some form, so that we can finally
get support for some of the sparcs RedHat is not currently supporting in
6.0 (i.e. sun4/330). We may be a minority among all sparc users, but we
are out there.
At 04:09 PM 4/28/99 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
>> > > Do you mean RedHat 6.0 runs on UltraSPARC systems?
>> > >
>> >
>> > Yes, it does. Most of the things being merged from UltraPenguin were
>> exactly
>> > changes to support sparc64.
>> > It is probably RHs fault not to put that in any kind of
>> > announcements, at least none of those I saw.
>>
>> Dang... I would think it would be incredibly good to "support" UltraSparc
>> machines...
>
>It is supported.
>
>> I would certainly have a market for UltraSparc/Linux for my
>> customers. They need to have a $39 version though :) Most of us with
>> UltraSparcs don't need 'official support' :-)
>
>I guess you have a choice right now. Either you go for the $0 version
>(either install from FTP/HTTP or burn your own CD - these two are the only
>options in UltraPenguin you had), or you go for a $40 version, or $80
>version (I don't know how much does it cost exactly but think I've read
>those two numbers for CD sets without/with installation support).
>
>I really don't think it would make any sense to cp -a redhat-6.0
>ultrapenguin-1.2
>and with the exception of tape install and maybe two or three little other
>things
>everything what was in ultrapenguin is in redhat, plus redhat 6.0 is based on
>glibc-2.1 and many things have changed since rh5.2 ultrapenguin-1.1.9 was
>forked from.
>
>Cheers,
> Jakub
>___________________________________________________________________
>Jakub Jelinek | jj@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz | http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz
>Administrator of SunSITE Czech Republic, MFF, Charles University
>___________________________________________________________________
>UltraLinux | http://ultra.linux.cz/ | http://ultra.penguin.cz/
>Linux version 2.2.5 on a sparc64 machine (3958.37 BogoMips)
>___________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-04-28 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-04-28 13:58 RedHat 6.0 runs on UltraSPARC? Randy Carpenter
1999-04-28 14:09 ` Jakub Jelinek
1999-04-28 14:46 ` Randy Carpenter
1999-04-28 14:51 ` Nicholas S. Wourms [this message]
1999-04-28 14:55 ` David Miller
1999-04-28 15:06 ` mc
1999-04-28 15:10 ` Anton Blanchard
1999-04-28 15:15 ` David Miller
1999-04-28 15:41 ` Matthew Kirkwood
1999-04-28 15:55 ` canavan
1999-04-28 16:13 ` Nils Lohner
1999-04-28 21:38 ` Bob Van Cleef
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ultrasparc-92531136302593@msgid-missing \
--to=nwourms@dialup.dstm.com \
--cc=ultralinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.