From: Joshua Uziel <uzi@uzix.org>
To: ultralinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: where is ultra linux going?
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 13:19:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ultrasparc-98353928632005@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ultrasparc-98345984016489@msgid-missing>
* Martin A. Marques <martin@math.unl.edu.ar> [010302 04:16]:
> Yes, but it seems as the other platforms are having lots of more attention,
> especially due to the fact that SUN isn't giving much help, because they
> support there Solaris operating system.
Well, honestly, who can blame Sun? Things are going so well that they
don't seem to feel that they should do anything. Actually, I take that
back... some people within Sun see the value and are cooperating with
the SPARC/Linux developers... some examples:
* Machines are loaned to linux distributors for working on distributions
as well as showing SPARC/Linux at tradeshows. Most (if not all)
SPARCs at LWENY recently were owned by Sun. This included the one in
the SuSE booth, the one in the Slackware/BSDI booth, and the one in
the Debian booth. Most of the work put into Slackware and Debian for
SPARC are built on machines loaned by Sun.
* Sun Microelectronics for a while involved DaveM in working to improve
Linux support for the AX motherboards.
* I'm being loaned an AX1105-500 for the purpose of working on support
for it and the new Sun Blade 100 (which is very similar).
Most of the other platforms have a Unix variant that is dead or at least
on it's way... Solaris still seems to be quite healthy.
> With respect of the distros, yes, we have just installed SUSE on an ultra5,
> and I have been looking at the Debian distribution. But are they fully 64bit?
> Have all the aplications been compiled for 64 bit SPARC? I know that this
> isn't the case of Debian, and I'm starting to think that the solution is to
> stick with Solaris or change the architecture (alpha maybe).
Speaking with Ben Collins (Debian) and Thorsten Kukuk (SuSE), they've
both played with 64-bit userspace. It seems that glibc is more or less
ready, but the compiler (eventually gcc 3.0) still needs work. Using
Jakub Jelinek's hacked compiler, though, you can now have a 64-bit
userspace on SPARC/Linux, but it's more or less experimental. In other
words, a 64-bit userland is "coming soon", but not here yet. Besides,
for the most part, a 64-bit userspace isn't all that needed. Even
Solaris ships with mostly 32-bit applications, and only 64-bit when it
really counts.
> It's all IMHO.
Of course. :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ultralinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-02 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-01 15:06 where is ultra linux going? Martin A. Marques
2001-03-01 23:10 ` Joshua Uziel
2001-03-01 23:49 ` dan carter
2001-03-02 0:40 ` Joshua Uziel
2001-03-02 12:12 ` Martin A. Marques
2001-03-02 13:19 ` Joshua Uziel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-ultrasparc-98353928632005@msgid-missing \
--to=uzi@uzix.org \
--cc=ultralinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.