All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
To: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf, arm64: Fix stack frame construction for struct_ops trampoline
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 19:32:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mb61ped49tfof.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241019092709.128359-1-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 992 bytes --]

Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com> writes:

> From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
>
> The callsite layout for arm64 fentry is:
>
> mov x9, lr
> nop
>
> When a bpf prog is attached, the nop instruction is patched to a call
> to bpf trampoline:
>
> mov x9, lr
> bl <bpf trampoline>
>
> This passes two return addresses to bpf trampoline: the return address
> for the traced function/prog, stored in x9, and the return address for
> the bpf trampoline, stored in lr. To ensure stacktrace works properly,
> the bpf trampoline constructs two fake function stack frames using x9
> and lr.
>
> However, struct_ops progs are used as function callbacks and are invoked
> directly, without x9 being set as the fentry callsite does. Therefore,
> only one stack frame should be constructed using lr for struct_ops.
>
> Fixes: efc9909fdce0 ("bpf, arm64: Add bpf trampoline for arm64")
> Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>

Tested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>

Thanks,
Puranjay

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 255 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-21 19:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-19  9:27 [PATCH bpf] bpf, arm64: Fix stack frame construction for struct_ops trampoline Xu Kuohai
2024-10-21  8:44 ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-10-21 19:32 ` Puranjay Mohan [this message]
2024-10-22 22:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-22 23:37   ` Puranjay Mohan
2024-10-23  3:16     ` Xu Kuohai
2024-10-24 13:48       ` Xu Kuohai
2024-10-24 16:24         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-10-25  7:51           ` Xu Kuohai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mb61ped49tfof.fsf@kernel.org \
    --to=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.