From: Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
To: linux-lvm@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Uncache a LV when a cache PV is gone, bug ?
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:21:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mr6ji3$nsn$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALtW_aiWxdJnNgUzCyYC_WjsRoEUUtGpnrVp9VwP60r63R+yRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Dne 20.8.2015 v 18:09 Dragan Milivojević napsal(a):
> Hi all
>
> I'm testing a recovery scenario for a NAS server which uses an SSD as
> a PV for the LVM cache (dm-cache).
> When I remove the SSD and try to uncache the LV I get this:
>
> [root@storage ~]# lvconvert -v --force --uncache /dev/total_storage/test
> WARNING: Device for PV yJvPgB-aPlc-wFG2-DL9U-MOKI-2F93-XlzHyf not
> found or rejected by a filter.
> There are 1 physical volumes missing.
> Cannot change VG total_storage while PVs are missing.
> Consider vgreduce --removemissing.
> There are 1 physical volumes missing.
>
> [root@storage ~]# vgreduce -v --force --removemissing total_storage
> Finding volume group "total_storage"
> WARNING: Device for PV yJvPgB-aPlc-wFG2-DL9U-MOKI-2F93-XlzHyf not
> found or rejected by a filter.
> There are 1 physical volumes missing.
> There are 1 physical volumes missing.
> Trying to open VG total_storage for recovery...
> WARNING: Device for PV yJvPgB-aPlc-wFG2-DL9U-MOKI-2F93-XlzHyf not
> found or rejected by a filter.
> There are 1 physical volumes missing.
> There are 1 physical volumes missing.
> Archiving volume group "total_storage" metadata (seqno 9).
> Removing partial LV test.
> activation/volume_list configuration setting not defined: Checking
> only host tags for total_storage/test
> Executing: /usr/sbin/modprobe dm-cache
> Creating total_storage-cache_pool00_cdata-missing_0_0
> Loading total_storage-cache_pool00_cdata-missing_0_0 table (253:3)
> Resuming total_storage-cache_pool00_cdata-missing_0_0 (253:3)
> Creating total_storage-cache_pool00_cdata
> Loading total_storage-cache_pool00_cdata table (253:4)
> Resuming total_storage-cache_pool00_cdata (253:4)
> Creating total_storage-cache_pool00_cmeta-missing_0_0
> Loading total_storage-cache_pool00_cmeta-missing_0_0 table (253:5)
> Resuming total_storage-cache_pool00_cmeta-missing_0_0 (253:5)
> Creating total_storage-cache_pool00_cmeta
> Loading total_storage-cache_pool00_cmeta table (253:6)
> Resuming total_storage-cache_pool00_cmeta (253:6)
> Creating total_storage-test_corig
> Loading total_storage-test_corig table (253:7)
> Resuming total_storage-test_corig (253:7)
> Executing: /usr/sbin/cache_check -q
> /dev/mapper/total_storage-cache_pool00_cmeta
>
> vgreduce gets stuck at the last step: /usr/sbin/cache_check
>
> If I run cache_check manually I get this:
>
> [root@storage ~]# /usr/sbin/cache_check
> /dev/mapper/total_storage-cache_pool00_cmeta
> examining superblock
> superblock is corrupt
> incomplete io for block 0, e.res = 18446744073709551611, e.res2 =
> 0, offset = 0, nbytes = 4096
>
> and it waits indefinitely.
>
> If a replace the /usr/sbin/cache_check with a shell script that returns 0 or 1
> vgreduce just errors out. It seems that there is no way to uncache the
> LV without
> replacing the missing PV (which could pose a problem in production use).
> The origin LV (test_corig) is fine, I can mount it and use it, there
> are no file-system issues etc.
>
> Is this an intended behaviour or a bug?
It's unhandled yet scenario.
Feel free to open BZ at bugzilla.redhat.com
Zdenek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-21 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-20 16:09 [linux-lvm] Uncache a LV when a cache PV is gone, bug ? Dragan Milivojević
2015-08-21 7:21 ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]
2015-08-21 12:22 ` matthew patton
2015-08-21 12:26 ` Dragan Milivojević
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-10-04 5:58 Robin Lee Powell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='mr6ji3$nsn$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.