From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: schwab@suse.de (Andreas Schwab)
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 17:09:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Enable CONFIG_COMPAT also for 64k page size
In-Reply-To: <550062D6.3000101@suse.de> (Alexander Graf's message of "Wed, 11
 Mar 2015 10:44:22 -0500")
References: <1417707993-82290-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de>
 <C0CF99B1-8706-4D9B-87E0-13A7C6C619D6@suse.de>
 <mvmegovejx0.fsf@hawking.suse.de> <2583329.jVX0TanYzO@wuerfel>
 <mvma8zjeixd.fsf@hawking.suse.de> <550062D6.3000101@suse.de>
Message-ID: <mvmtwxrcy81.fsf@hawking.suse.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes:

> Andreas, would you like to send this upstream as a proper top-level
> patch or would you prefer if I do a patch set with the 2 patches (enable
> CONFIG_COMPAT on 64k PAGE_SIZE and your patch)?

They only make sense in combination, so go for the patch set.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab at suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752076AbbCKQJh (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:09:37 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:39224 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751056AbbCKQJg (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:09:36 -0400
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        "linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>, Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>,
        "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Dirk =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=BCller?= <dmueller@suse.com>,
        Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Enable CONFIG_COMPAT also for 64k page size
References: <1417707993-82290-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de>
	<C0CF99B1-8706-4D9B-87E0-13A7C6C619D6@suse.de>
	<mvmegovejx0.fsf@hawking.suse.de> <2583329.jVX0TanYzO@wuerfel>
	<mvma8zjeixd.fsf@hawking.suse.de> <550062D6.3000101@suse.de>
X-Yow: First, I'm going to give you all the ANSWERS to today's test..
 So just plug in your SONY WALKMANS and relax!!
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 17:09:34 +0100
In-Reply-To: <550062D6.3000101@suse.de> (Alexander Graf's message of "Wed, 11
	Mar 2015 10:44:22 -0500")
Message-ID: <mvmtwxrcy81.fsf@hawking.suse.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.91 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes:

> Andreas, would you like to send this upstream as a proper top-level
> patch or would you prefer if I do a patch set with the 2 patches (enable
> CONFIG_COMPAT on 64k PAGE_SIZE and your patch)?

They only make sense in combination, so go for the patch set.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."