From: Neuer User <auslands-kv@gmx.de>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: btrfs und lvm-cache?
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:45:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <n5du09$9rn$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
Hello
I want to setup a small homeserver, based on a HP Microserver Gen8 (4GB
RAM, 2x3TB HDD + 1x120GB SSD) and Proxmox as distro.
The server will be used to host a (small) number of virtual machines,
most of them being LXC containers, few being KVM machines. One of the
LXC containers will host a fileserver with app 1 TB of data and another
one a backup system for the desktops / laptops in my household, thus
probably holding quite a lot of files. The lxc containers will use the
filesystem of the proxmox host, the KVM machines probably raw disk files
(or qcow2).
I would like to combine high data integrity with some speed, so I
thought of the following layout:
- both hdd and ssd in one LVM VG
- one LV on each hdd, containing a btrfs filesystem
- both btrfs LV configured as RAID1
- the single SDD used as a LVM cache device for both HDD LVs to speed up
random access, where possible
Now, I wonder if that is a good architecture to go for. Any input on
that? Is btrfs the right way to go for, or should I better go for ZFS
(and purchase some more gigs of RAM)?
Will there be any problems arising from the lvmcache? btrfs only sees
the HDDs, LVM does the SDD handling.
Thanks for any input. I like btrfs very much, but data integrity is
important for this.
Michael
next reply other threads:[~2015-12-23 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-23 10:45 Neuer User [this message]
2015-12-23 11:21 ` btrfs und lvm-cache? Martin Steigerwald
2015-12-23 11:38 ` Neuer User
2015-12-23 19:45 ` Noah Massey
2015-12-23 20:07 ` Neuer User
2015-12-23 20:38 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2015-12-23 19:49 ` Chris Murphy
2015-12-23 20:21 ` Neuer User
2015-12-23 20:56 ` Chris Murphy
2015-12-24 15:19 ` Neuer User
2015-12-23 20:24 ` Neuer User
2015-12-23 20:59 ` Chris Murphy
2015-12-24 2:04 ` Duncan
2015-12-24 15:24 ` Neuer User
2015-12-24 14:56 ` Piotr Pawłow
2015-12-24 15:29 ` Neuer User
2015-12-24 16:42 ` Piotr Pawłow
2015-12-25 17:11 ` Neuer User
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='n5du09$9rn$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=auslands-kv@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.