From: NyOS <lista@nyos.homelinux.net>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] objective benchmark?
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 02:07:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.s9mam1nyt9pcbo@mail.chello.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200605152203.00826.mr@ramendik.ru>
On Mon, 15 May 2006 20:03:00 +0200, Mikhail Ramendik <mr@ramendik.ru>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As I have reported before, it seems that on my host linux system kqemu
> does
> not work with guest win98se.
>
> Is there any benchmark that I could run in the guest, with and without
> kqemu,
> to check if this is so objectively? (Ideally I'd like two benchmarks -
> 16-bit
> and 32-bit code).
>
Hi!
An ANSI-C benchmark program:
http://www.hit.bme.hu/anonftp/pongor/benchmar/bm-ansi.c
It should be compiled by full optimization.
and some results:
http://www.hit.bme.hu/anonftp/pongor/benchmar/bm-times.all
I'm not sure whether is it really objective. Tests only the processor's
speed (not I/O).
It was written, and maintained by one of my teachers, Gyorgy Pongor, until
he died 2 or 3 years ago. By that time, he collected many result files
(even PDP-11 and VAX machines!), that is the second link above.
You can try a 16 bit compiler also (e.g. ancient Borland compiler).
Miklos Gyozo
p.s.
my results:
on host:
===== Results of bench marks V.6.4, Pongor, György =====
Type of machine : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz, 3006.943, 1024 KB
Type of compiler : gcc version 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-7), gcc -O3 bm-ansi.c
-o nyosO3 -lm
Name of this result file : nyosO3.bm
Length of integer = 32 bits
Length of double mantissa = 64 bits
Length of address = 32 bits
Precision of time estimation = 1%
Clock resolution = 1000000.000 clocks/sec
==> Minimal execution time of one test: 2 sec
Test 1: Direct select. sort 1000 real numbers ----- Time= 0.00193
sec
Test 2: Discrete Fourier Transform of 128 reals ----- Time= 0.00258
sec
Test 3: Find first 1000 primes ----- Time= 0.00742
sec
Test 4: Sieve of Eratosthenes with 2000 numbers ----- Time= 2.01e-05
sec
Test 5: FFT of 1024 complex numbers ----- Time= 7.32e-05
sec
Test 6: Invert a matrix of 50 * 50 reals ----- Time= 0.000789
sec
Test 7: Calculate Binom(18,7) ----- Time= 0.000518
sec
Average performance : 3207.6 "MicroVAX II MIPS"
----- Summary of results -----
Machine : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz, 3006.943, 1024 KB
Compiler : gcc version 3.3.6 (Debian 1:3.3.6-7), gcc -O3 bm-ansi.c -o
nyosO3 -lm
|fpp? | 32 64 32 ? | 1.929e-03 2.578e-03 7.422e-03
2.012e-05 7.324e-05 7.886e-04 5.176e-04 | 3207.615 |
the same binary on qemu (0.7.2):
===== Results of bench marks V.6.4, Pongor, György =====
Type of machine : Pentium II (Klamath) QEMU, 3009.347, 128 KB
Type of compiler : gcc the same
Name of this result file : nyosO3qemu.bm
Length of integer = 32 bits
Length of double mantissa = 64 bits
Length of address = 32 bits
Precision of time estimation = 1%
Clock resolution = 1000000.000 clocks/sec
==> Minimal execution time of one test: 2 sec
Test 1: Direct select. sort 1000 real numbers ----- Time= 0.00219
sec
Test 2: Discrete Fourier Transform of 128 reals ----- Time= 0.00289
sec
Test 3: Find first 1000 primes ----- Time= 0.0084
sec
Test 4: Sieve of Eratosthenes with 2000 numbers ----- Time= 4.14e-05
sec
Test 5: FFT of 1024 complex numbers ----- Time= 0.000103
sec
Test 6: Invert a matrix of 50 * 50 reals ----- Time= 0.000947
sec
Test 7: Calculate Binom(18,7) ----- Time= 0.000594
sec
Average performance : 2541.7 "MicroVAX II MIPS"
----- Summary of results -----
Machine : Pentium II (Klamath) QEMU, 3009.347, 128 KB
Compiler : gcc ugyanugy
|fpp? | 32 64 32 ? | 2.188e-03 2.891e-03 8.398e-03
4.141e-05 1.031e-04 9.473e-04 5.938e-04 | 2541.747 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-16 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-15 18:03 [Qemu-devel] objective benchmark? Mikhail Ramendik
2006-05-15 20:25 ` Natalia Portillo
2006-05-15 21:13 ` Mikhail Ramendik
2006-05-16 0:07 ` NyOS [this message]
2006-05-16 4:12 ` Anthony Liguori
2006-05-16 6:41 ` Kazu
2006-05-16 6:55 ` Christian MICHON
2006-05-16 9:26 ` Kazu
2006-05-16 10:23 ` Christian MICHON
2006-05-17 7:24 ` Kazu
2006-05-16 11:48 ` Lonnie Mendez
2006-05-17 7:24 ` Kazu
2006-05-17 9:09 ` Lonnie Mendez
2006-05-17 19:18 ` Fabrice Bellard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-16 12:53 Ben Taylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=op.s9mam1nyt9pcbo@mail.chello.hu \
--to=lista@nyos.homelinux.net \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.