From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-2?B?o3VrYXN6IE1pZXJ6d2E=?= Subject: Re: journal size reiserfs vs reiser4 Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 19:37:40 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20050901134604.31ddd297@SiRiUS.home> <20050901144842.34629bcf@SiRiUS.home> <4316F9CC.2090904@namesys.com> <20050901150507.3d6f53c7@SiRiUS.home> <4316FD28.5020304@redhat.com> <43171D57.3030007@namesys.com> <431726F2.1090508@redhat.com> <4317F28F.80704@namesys.com> <4317FD1B.504@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <4317FD1B.504@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"; charset="iso-8859-1" To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Dnia Fri, 02 Sep 2005 09:19:55 +0200, Hans Reiser napi= sa=B3: > It could probably be a lot less than 5%, 2% is more than enough I would > guess, but we also need to reserve space to get good performance. > Maybe You can make it an mkfs.reiser4 option, set 5% to default so it won't= change anything to 99% of people using reiser4 but will make that 1% that = want some other value happy.