All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lloyd Standish" <lloyd@crnatural.net>
To: Thomas Jacob <jacob@internet24.de>
Cc: "netfilter@vger.kernel.org" <netfilter@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: still can't route using fwmark
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:49:29 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.uslqwresx1lyi3@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090418205802.GA16790@internet24.de>

On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:58:02 -0600, Thomas Jacob <jacob@internet24.de> wrote:


> Are you forwarding packets via this box, or do you want to loadbalance
> packets from the local machine? In the latter case the PREROUTING
> stuff needs to go into INPUT/OUTPUT.

Well, I want to load-balance packets from the local machine, which is serving as gateway for a home LAN (eth0).  The local machine is 192.168.1.1 on the LAN.

Might this point you made be my problem?  I will try removing the network 192.168.1.0 and just use lo, to see what happens.

>> > Also you could try to remove those two routes in the default table, which I
>> > gather from your description are routes for $gw0=$gw1=10.60.255.254 (btw, the
>> > second will normally never be used anyway), I remember having problems before
>> > when routes matched after the policy route tables in the main table.
>>
>> Do you mean the routes in the rt_link1 and rt_link2 tables?
>
> no, the ones in the "main" routing table (that you displayed using "ip route show [table main]).
>

When I remove the default route in the main routing table, I completely lose Internet connectivity.   My logic tells me that a default "main" route should not be necessary at all if all packets are marked and sent to my 2 custom routing tables (rt_link1/2), each of which has a default route.


> Yes, if you have a way to find your gateway (which is sort of implicit
> when both gateway are on the same ethernet link with mask /24 for instance), but
> in your case you seem to need host routes to designate where your default
> gateways are (the first route in rt_link1/2), 

>and the two routes in main
> are the same as the first route in rt_link1 and 2 combined, right?
YES

The gateways are assigned at the time the ppp0 and ppp1 links are established.  I get it by:
debiandesk:/home/lloyd/data/loadbal# ip route show dev ppp1
10.60.255.254  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.60.9.178

So, I can use this shell script line to get the gateway for ppp1 into variable gw1:
gw1=`ip route show dev ppp1 | head -n1 | cut --delimiter=" " --fields=1`

The only experience I have with iptables is simple firewall stuff for my Internet-connected server.  My grasp of routing is weak, and this trouble is good experience in an area I would like to become expert in.  

>
> But maybe one does not need gateways for ppp since there should be no one else
> on that link anyway (as you suggested with your "default dev pppX" routes).

I don't think I understand your comment.   I need a gateway IP to forward Internet queries to... 
>
>
> I am running out of ideas, sorry, maybe someone else on the list
> can chime in, I've only ever done policy routing with public IPs and
> broadcast networks, and there it always worked without problems
> on stock Debian Etch, CentOS 5.X or custom built kernels.

I really appreciate your advice.  I'm a networking novice so my ideas are not rooted in experience, but I think it should not matter that the gateway IP is a private IP.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-18 21:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-18  4:40 still can't route using fwmark Lloyd Standish
2009-04-18  8:23 ` Thomas Jacob
2009-04-18 17:12   ` Lloyd Standish
2009-04-18 18:48     ` Thomas Jacob
2009-04-18 19:33       ` Lloyd Standish
2009-04-18 20:58         ` Thomas Jacob
2009-04-18 21:49           ` Lloyd Standish [this message]
2009-04-19  9:00             ` Thomas Jacob
2009-04-20  5:56               ` Lloyd Standish
2009-04-20  8:48                 ` Javier Gálvez Guerrero
2009-04-20 11:44                   ` Thomas Jacob
2009-04-20 13:08                     ` Javier Gálvez Guerrero
2009-04-20 13:37                       ` Thomas Jacob
2009-04-20 15:15                         ` Javier Gálvez Guerrero
2009-04-20 18:59                           ` Thomas Jacob
2009-04-22  9:53                             ` Javier Gálvez Guerrero
2009-04-22 10:01                               ` Thomas Jacob
2009-04-20 11:09                 ` Thomas Jacob
2009-04-20 12:25                   ` Brian Austin - Standard Universal
2009-04-20 15:38                   ` Lloyd Standish
2009-04-20 19:26                     ` Thomas Jacob
2009-04-21 19:54                       ` Lloyd Standish
2009-04-22  9:35                         ` Thomas Jacob
2009-04-22 15:03                           ` Lloyd Standish
2009-04-18 23:14           ` Lloyd Standish

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=op.uslqwresx1lyi3@localhost \
    --to=lloyd@crnatural.net \
    --cc=jacob@internet24.de \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.