From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: m.nazarewicz@samsung.com (=?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBOYXphcmV3aWN6?=) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 03:20:57 +0200 Subject: [PATCH/RFCv4 3/6] mm: cma: Added SysFS support In-Reply-To: <20100825203707.GB5318@phenom.dumpdata.com> References: <0b02e05fc21e70a3af39e65e628d117cd89d70a1.1282286941.git.m.nazarewicz@samsung.com> <343f4b0edf9b5eef598831700cb459cd428d3f2e.1282286941.git.m.nazarewicz@samsung.com> <9883433f103cc84e55db150806d2270200c74c6b.1282286941.git.m.nazarewicz@samsung.com> <20100825203707.GB5318@phenom.dumpdata.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:37:08 +0200, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > Whats the rationale for having those #ifdef CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS sprinkled > in the C code? Is SysFS not used on StrongARM? Why not implicitly include > the SysFS support? The SysFS CMA interface is meant for development only and because of that I decided to separate it form the core in a separate patch and enable it only when explicitly requested. -- Best regards, _ _ | Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o | Computer Science, Micha? "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o) +----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753660Ab0HZBWG (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2010 21:22:06 -0400 Received: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.12]:48669 "EHLO mailout2.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753234Ab0HZBWD convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2010 21:22:03 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 03:20:57 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBOYXphcmV3aWN6?= Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFCv4 3/6] mm: cma: Added SysFS support In-reply-to: <20100825203707.GB5318@phenom.dumpdata.com> To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Hans Verkuil , Daniel Walker , Russell King , Jonathan Corbet , Pawel Osciak , Mark Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, FUJITA Tomonori , linux-mm@kvack.org, Kyungmin Park , Zach Pfeffer , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marek Szyprowski Message-id: Organization: Samsung Electronics MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.61 (Linux) References: <0b02e05fc21e70a3af39e65e628d117cd89d70a1.1282286941.git.m.nazarewicz@samsung.com> <343f4b0edf9b5eef598831700cb459cd428d3f2e.1282286941.git.m.nazarewicz@samsung.com> <9883433f103cc84e55db150806d2270200c74c6b.1282286941.git.m.nazarewicz@samsung.com> <20100825203707.GB5318@phenom.dumpdata.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:37:08 +0200, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > Whats the rationale for having those #ifdef CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS sprinkled > in the C code? Is SysFS not used on StrongARM? Why not implicitly include > the SysFS support? The SysFS CMA interface is meant for development only and because of that I decided to separate it form the core in a separate patch and enable it only when explicitly requested. -- Best regards, _ _ | Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o | Computer Science, Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o) +----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C4E76B02B7 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 21:22:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from eu_spt1 (mailout1.w1.samsung.com [210.118.77.11]) by mailout1.w1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id <0L7Q007SIJSLGI@mailout1.w1.samsung.com> for linux-mm@kvack.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 02:22:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from linux.samsung.com ([106.116.38.10]) by spt1.w1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0L7Q0020VJSKRJ@spt1.w1.samsung.com> for linux-mm@kvack.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 02:21:56 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 03:20:57 +0200 From: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBOYXphcmV3aWN6?= Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFCv4 3/6] mm: cma: Added SysFS support In-reply-to: <20100825203707.GB5318@phenom.dumpdata.com> Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-Printable References: <0b02e05fc21e70a3af39e65e628d117cd89d70a1.1282286941.git.m.nazarewicz@samsung.com> <343f4b0edf9b5eef598831700cb459cd428d3f2e.1282286941.git.m.nazarewicz@samsung.com> <9883433f103cc84e55db150806d2270200c74c6b.1282286941.git.m.nazarewicz@samsung.com> <20100825203707.GB5318@phenom.dumpdata.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Hans Verkuil , Daniel Walker , Russell King , Jonathan Corbet , Pawel Osciak , Mark Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, FUJITA Tomonori , linux-mm@kvack.org, Kyungmin Park , Zach Pfeffer , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marek Szyprowski List-ID: On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:37:08 +0200, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > Whats the rationale for having those #ifdef CONFIG_CMA_SYSFS sprinkled= > in the C code? Is SysFS not used on StrongARM? Why not implicitly incl= ude > the SysFS support? The SysFS CMA interface is meant for development only and because of tha= t I decided to separate it form the core in a separate patch and enable it= only when explicitly requested. -- = Best regards, _ _ | Humble Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=3D./ `o | Computer Science, Micha=C5=82 "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o) +----[mina86*mina86.com]---[mina86*jabber.org]----ooO--(_)--Ooo-- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org