From: "Łukasz Mierzwa" <prymitive@o2.pl>
To: "reiserfs-list@namesys.com" <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: problem with reiser4
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:57:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <opsn3ih3nst3f2uk@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <opsnkzb7igt3f2uk@localhost>
Dnia Sun, 13 Mar 2005 15:46:45 +0100, £ukasz Mierzwa <prymitive@o2.pl> napisa³:
> Dnia Tue, 01 Mar 2005 10:54:35 -0800, fitzboy <fitzboy@iparadigms.com> napisa³:
>
>> Hello all,
>> I'm just switching from 2.4/reiser3 to 2.6/reiser4 on the first batch of
>> machines. We are running a bunch of apple xRAIDs connected to Dell
>> servers running Debian. we have the 2.6.10-mm kernel and we can make the
>> reiser4 partitions, but there is a lot of lost space somewhere. If I
>> create a reiser3 or xfs partition, I get 1.1T, but with reiser4 I can't
>> get above 984GB. That is too much of a jump to be explained by overhead,
>> so something is wrong... any thoughts?
>
It's still present in reiser4-for-2.6.11-1 patch:
gremlin prymitive # mkfs.reiserfs /dev/hda6
mkfs.reiserfs 3.6.19 (2003 www.namesys.com)
A pair of credits:
Lycos Europe (www.lycos-europe.com) had a support contract with us that
consistently came in just when we would otherwise have missed payroll, and that
they kept doubling every year. Much thanks to them.
Chris Mason wrote the journaling code for V3, which was enormously more useful
to users than just waiting until we could create a wandering log filesystem as
Hans would have unwisely done without him.
Jeff Mahoney optimized the bitmap scanning code for V3, and performed the big
endian cleanups.
Guessing about desired format.. Kernel 2.6.11-gentoo-r4 is running.
Format 3.6 with standard journal
Count of blocks on the device: 2522192
Number of blocks consumed by mkreiserfs formatting process: 8288
Blocksize: 4096
Hash function used to sort names: "r5"
Journal Size 8193 blocks (first block 18)
Journal Max transaction length 1024
inode generation number: 0
UUID: 5f7b9070-0f62-496c-b288-308663df7689
ATTENTION: YOU SHOULD REBOOT AFTER FDISK!
ALL DATA WILL BE LOST ON '/dev/hda6'!
Continue (y/n):y
Initializing journal - 0%....20%....40%....60%....80%....100%
Syncing..ok
Tell your friends to use a kernel based on 2.4.18 or later, and especially not a
kernel based on 2.4.9, when you use reiserFS. Have fun.
ReiserFS is successfully created on /dev/hda6.
gremlin prymitive # mount -t reiserfs /dev/hda6 /mnt/cdrw/
df
gremlin prymitive # df
System plików bl. 1MB B u¿yte dostêpne %u¿. zamont. na
/dev/hda1 9731MB 5882MB 3849MB 61% /
/dev/hda5 60997MB 32990MB 28008MB 55% /home
none 262MB 0MB 262MB 0% /dev/shm
/dev/hda6 10331MB 34MB 10297MB 1% /mnt/cdrw
gremlin prymitive # umount /mnt/cdrw
gremlin prymitive # mkfs.reiser4 /dev/hda6
mkfs.reiser4 1.0.4
Copyright (C) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 by Hans Reiser, licensing governed by reiser4progs/COPYING.
Block size 4096 will be used.
Linux 2.6.11-gentoo-r4 is detected.
Uuid dfe381a5-0eca-4844-9502-6576da0abc3f will be used.
Reiser4 is going to be created on /dev/hda6.
(Yes/No): Yes
Creating reiser4 on /dev/hda6 ... done
gremlin prymitive # mount -t reiser4 /dev/hda6 /mnt/cdrw/
gremlin prymitive # df
System plików bl. 1MB B u¿yte dostêpne %u¿. zamont. na
/dev/hda1 9731MB 5882MB 3849MB 61% /
/dev/hda5 60997MB 32990MB 28008MB 55% /home
none 262MB 0MB 262MB 0% /dev/shm
/dev/hda6 9817MB 1MB 9816MB 1% /mnt/cdrw
10331MB on reiserfs 3.6 vs 9817MB on reiser4
this was run under amd64 gentoo box
reiser4progs and libaal 1.0.4 were used
kernel was 2.6.11 patched with reiser4-for-2.6.11-1 pulled from namesys server
Can someone help with this bug?
£ukasz Mierzwa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-23 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-01 18:54 problem with reiser4 fitzboy
2005-03-01 19:07 ` Fred Schaettgen
2005-03-01 22:06 ` Hans Reiser
2005-03-13 14:46 ` Łukasz Mierzwa
2005-03-13 15:29 ` Simon Raffeiner
2005-03-23 14:57 ` Łukasz Mierzwa [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-15 23:40 Problem with Reiser4 Tobi Kunze
2005-12-15 23:46 ` Artur Makówka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=opsn3ih3nst3f2uk@localhost \
--to=prymitive@o2.pl \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.