From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Oliva Subject: Re: Patches for BTRFS (mail-server slow down in 3.0 and more) Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:08:32 -0200 Message-ID: References: <4EAB270C.60406@malowa.de> <20111029051206.GB4054@shiny.Mikenopa.local> <20111031143027.GD19328@twin.jikos.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Marcel Lohmann , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Mason Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20111031143027.GD19328@twin.jikos.cz> (David Sterba's message of "Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:30:27 +0100") List-ID: On Oct 31, 2011, David Sterba wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 02:19:18AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> On Oct 29, 2011, Chris Mason wrote: >> >> > The last one isn't a bad idea, but please do make a real mount option >> > for it ;) >> >> Like this? > @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ static match_table_t tokens = { > {Opt_subvolrootid, "subvolrootid=%d"}, > {Opt_defrag, "autodefrag"}, > {Opt_inode_cache, "inode_cache"}, > + {Opt_nocluster, "nocluster"}, > {Opt_err, NULL}, > How about 'no_alloc_cluster' ? I considered that, too, but choosing the option name was the most difficult part of the patch :-) I ended up going for the shorter name, just to get the conversation started ;-) I don't feel strongly about it. -- Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/ You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/ FSF Latin America board member Free Software Evangelist Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer