From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3F3BC25B7A for ; Fri, 24 May 2024 16:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.729641.1134849 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sAXL0-00067a-Dd; Fri, 24 May 2024 16:00:10 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 729641.1134849; Fri, 24 May 2024 16:00:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sAXL0-00067T-Au; Fri, 24 May 2024 16:00:10 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 729641; Fri, 24 May 2024 16:00:08 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sAXKy-00067I-U3; Fri, 24 May 2024 16:00:08 +0000 Received: from host146.205.237.98.conversent.net ([205.237.98.146] helo=infra.test-lab.xenproject.org) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sAXKy-0005Wu-RL; Fri, 24 May 2024 16:00:08 +0000 Received: from [172.16.148.1] (helo=osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org) by infra.test-lab.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sAXKy-0001kz-Ga; Fri, 24 May 2024 16:00:08 +0000 Received: from osstest by osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sAXKy-0005Ym-Fz; Fri, 24 May 2024 16:00:08 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenproject.org; s=20200302mail; h=Date:From:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Message-ID:To; bh=6nbpPd891jysUl7mV3rZhV6UGpUb6cWxlH7BVZjsZDw=; b=DYDWITbNVdtOWoHvzryHa4/i34 vWX/8UjzdKIkyd/Pl1X0roWn66CcOjP9rMOO1faXC7p0F91BkZjaAiGPi0caeqqO+5V/7IlcAAPpB khv6vsflQf+WkvirFONNLxp9ya9gEwP+bN12EnApR6bCl0z2nHLq0QMfGY5iGoSWszi8=; To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [xen-unstable-smoke test] 186136: regressions - FAIL X-Osstest-Failures: xen-unstable-smoke:build-armhf:xen-build:fail:regression xen-unstable-smoke:test-armhf-armhf-xl:build-check(1):blocked:nonblocking xen-unstable-smoke:test-amd64-amd64-libvirt:migrate-support-check:fail:nonblocking xen-unstable-smoke:test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm:migrate-support-check:fail:nonblocking xen-unstable-smoke:test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm:saverestore-support-check:fail:nonblocking X-Osstest-Versions-This: xen=701190abb3d5873cf77349b3d90bd11ded74871a X-Osstest-Versions-That: xen=2a40b106e92aaa7ce808c8608dd6473edc67f608 From: osstest service owner Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 16:00:08 +0000 flight 186136 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/186136/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf 6 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 186117 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-xl 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15 migrate-support-check fail never pass test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 15 migrate-support-check fail never pass test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 16 saverestore-support-check fail never pass version targeted for testing: xen 701190abb3d5873cf77349b3d90bd11ded74871a baseline version: xen 2a40b106e92aaa7ce808c8608dd6473edc67f608 Last test of basis 186117 2024-05-23 17:02:09 Z 0 days Testing same since 186136 2024-05-24 14:02:11 Z 0 days 1 attempts ------------------------------------------------------------ People who touched revisions under test: Henry Wang Henry Wang jobs: build-arm64-xsm pass build-amd64 pass build-armhf fail build-amd64-libvirt pass test-armhf-armhf-xl blocked test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm pass test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 pass test-amd64-amd64-libvirt pass ------------------------------------------------------------ sg-report-flight on osstest.test-lab.xenproject.org logs: /home/logs/logs images: /home/logs/images Logs, config files, etc. are available at http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs Explanation of these reports, and of osstest in general, is at http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README.email;hb=master http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=osstest.git;a=blob;f=README;hb=master Test harness code can be found at http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary Not pushing. ------------------------------------------------------------ commit 701190abb3d5873cf77349b3d90bd11ded74871a Author: Henry Wang Date: Thu Mar 21 11:57:06 2024 +0800 xen/arm: Set correct per-cpu cpu_core_mask In the common sysctl command XEN_SYSCTL_physinfo, the value of cores_per_socket is calculated based on the cpu_core_mask of CPU0. Currently on Arm this is a fixed value 1 (can be checked via xl info), which is not correct. This is because during the Arm CPU online process at boot time, setup_cpu_sibling_map() only sets the per-cpu cpu_core_mask for itself. cores_per_socket refers to the number of cores that belong to the same socket (NUMA node). Currently Xen on Arm does not support physical CPU hotplug and NUMA, also we assume there is no multithread. Therefore cores_per_socket means all possible CPUs detected from the device tree. Setting the per-cpu cpu_core_mask in setup_cpu_sibling_map() accordingly. Modify the in-code comment which seems to be outdated. Add a warning to users if Xen is running on processors with multithread support. Signed-off-by: Henry Wang Signed-off-by: Henry Wang Reviewed-by: Michal Orzel (qemu changes not included)