From: xen.org <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com
Subject: [xen-4.3-testing test] 20864: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 19:02:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <osstest-20864-mainreport@xen.org> (raw)
flight 20864 xen-4.3-testing real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/20864/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-pvops 3 host-build-prep fail REGR. vs. 20813
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass
version targeted for testing:
xen 7b17418d1a09fa386222394c0ba30be3bd179c8a
baseline version:
xen 66414e76c5abab743c031e688a863966f3b16664
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
------------------------------------------------------------
jobs:
build-amd64 pass
build-armhf pass
build-i386 pass
build-amd64-oldkern pass
build-i386-oldkern pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-armhf-pvops broken
build-i386-pvops pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd pass
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd pass
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel pass
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel pass
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu pass
test-amd64-amd64-pair pass
test-amd64-i386-pair pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin pass
test-amd64-amd64-pv pass
test-amd64-i386-pv pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 fail
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on woking.cam.xci-test.com
logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs
images: /home/xc_osstest/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Not pushing.
------------------------------------------------------------
commit 7b17418d1a09fa386222394c0ba30be3bd179c8a
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Date: Mon Oct 14 11:18:20 2013 +0200
x86: check for canonical address before doing page walks
... as there doesn't really exists any valid mapping for them.
Particularly in the case of do_page_walk() this also avoids returning
non-NULL for such invalid input.
Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
master commit: 6fd9b0361e2eb5a7f12bdd5cbf7e42c0d1937d26
master date: 2013-10-11 09:31:16 +0200
commit 6ab2551502847834c9c4e581d546ccfcf72a51a6
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Date: Mon Oct 14 11:17:45 2013 +0200
x86: add address validity check to guest_map_l1e()
Just like for guest_get_eff_l1e() this prevents accessing as page
tables (and with the wrong memory attribute) internal data inside Xen
happening to be mapped with 1Gb pages.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
master commit: d06a0d715ec1423b6c42141ab1b0ff69a3effb56
master date: 2013-10-11 09:29:43 +0200
commit 32ff880f6e8f8898a1cefead79a65513140d2791
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Date: Mon Oct 14 11:16:32 2013 +0200
x86: correct LDT checks
- MMUEXT_SET_LDT should behave as similarly to the LLDT instruction as
possible: fail only if the base address is non-canonical
- instead LDT descriptor accesses should fault if the descriptor
address ends up being non-canonical (by ensuring this we at once
avoid reading an entry from the mach-to-phys table and consider it a
page table entry)
- fault propagation on using LDT selectors must distinguish #PF and #GP
(the latter must be raised for a non-canonical descriptor address,
which also applies to several other uses of propagate_page_fault(),
and hence the problem is being fixed there)
- map_ldt_shadow_page() should properly wrap addresses for 32-bit VMs
At once remove the odd invokation of map_ldt_shadow_page() from the
MMUEXT_SET_LDT handler: There's nothing really telling us that the
first LDT page is going to be preferred over others.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
master commit: 40d66baa46ca8a9ffa6df3e063a967d08ec92bcf
master date: 2013-10-11 09:28:26 +0200
(qemu changes not included)
reply other threads:[~2013-10-14 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=osstest-20864-mainreport@xen.org \
--to=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.