From: xen.org <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com
Subject: [xen-4.3-testing test] 25829: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 23:59:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <osstest-25829-mainreport@xen.org> (raw)
flight 25829 xen-4.3-testing real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/25829/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386 2 host-install(2) broken REGR. vs. 25814
build-i386-pvops 2 host-install(2) broken REGR. vs. 25814
build-amd64 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 25814
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-pv 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-pv 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-pair 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-armhf-armhf-xl 5 xen-boot fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-pair 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
version targeted for testing:
xen 6c733e549889a9b8c4e03140348b8e00241d4ce9
baseline version:
xen 651da73a2bbe4a54008f779ef65a147a760f4def
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
jobs:
build-amd64 fail
build-armhf pass
build-i386 broken
build-amd64-oldkern pass
build-i386-oldkern pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-armhf-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops broken
test-amd64-amd64-xl blocked
test-armhf-armhf-xl fail
test-amd64-i386-xl blocked
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd blocked
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd blocked
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd blocked
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 blocked
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel blocked
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel blocked
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel blocked
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu blocked
test-amd64-amd64-pair blocked
test-amd64-i386-pair blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin blocked
test-amd64-amd64-pv blocked
test-amd64-i386-pv blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 blocked
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on osstest.cam.xci-test.com
logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs
images: /home/xc_osstest/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Not pushing.
------------------------------------------------------------
commit 6c733e549889a9b8c4e03140348b8e00241d4ce9
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Date: Wed Apr 9 11:24:43 2014 +0200
x86/HVM: correct CPUID leaf 80000008 handling
CPUID[80000008].EAX[23:16] have been given the meaning of the guest
physical address restriction (in case it needs to be smaller than the
host's), hence we need to mirror that into vCPUID[80000008].EAX[7:0].
Enforce a lower limit at the same time, as well as a fixed value for
the virtual address bits, and zero for the guest physical address ones.
In order for the vMTRR code to see these overrides we need to make it
call hvm_cpuid() instead of domain_cpuid(), which in turn requires
special casing (and relaxing) the controlling domain.
This additionally should hide an ordering problem in the tools: Both
xend and xl appear to be restoring a guest from its image before
setting up the CPUID policy in the hypervisor, resulting in
domain_cpuid() returning all zeros and hence the check in
mtrr_var_range_msr_set() failing if the guest previously had more than
the minimum 36 physical address bits.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
master commit: ef437690af8b75e6758dce77af75a22b63982883
master date: 2014-03-28 13:33:34 +0100
(qemu changes not included)
reply other threads:[~2014-04-09 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=osstest-25829-mainreport@xen.org \
--to=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.