From: xen.org <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com
Subject: [xen-unstable test] 7307: regressions - FAIL
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 10:06:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <osstest-7307-mainreport@xen.org> (raw)
flight 7307 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/7307/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
test-amd64-i386-pair 16 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 7285
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking,
including regressions (tests previously passed) regarded as allowable:
test-amd64-amd64-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 8 guest-saverestore fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 8 guest-saverestore fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 8 guest-saverestore fail never pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 8 guest-saverestore fail never pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-win 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-i386-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-i386-i386-xl-win 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
version targeted for testing:
xen 4326bcd88b33
baseline version:
xen 37c77bacb52a
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
jobs:
build-i386-xcpkern pass
build-amd64 pass
build-i386 pass
build-amd64-oldkern pass
build-i386-oldkern pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-xl pass
test-i386-i386-xl pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl pass
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd fail
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-amd fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-credit2 pass
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel fail
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-multivcpu pass
test-amd64-amd64-pair pass
test-amd64-i386-pair fail
test-i386-i386-pair pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pair pass
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pair pass
test-amd64-amd64-pv pass
test-amd64-i386-pv pass
test-i386-i386-pv pass
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pv pass
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pv pass
test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-amd64-win fail
test-amd64-i386-win fail
test-i386-i386-win fail
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-win fail
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-win fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win fail
test-i386-i386-xl-win fail
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-win fail
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on woking.cam.xci-test.com
logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs
images: /home/xc_osstest/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Not pushing.
------------------------------------------------------------
changeset: 23371:4326bcd88b33
tag: tip
user: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
date: Mon May 23 18:35:32 2011 +0100
drivers/passthrough: fix error paths in pci_add_device*()
When a device can't be allocated to dom0 by the IOMMU, don't leave
dom0 in the "domain" field. It causes pci_remove_device()
to crash trying to remove the dev from the domain's list of devices
(and was probably the wrong thing to do anyway).
Signed-off-by: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
changeset: 23370:2e6719425265
user: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
date: Mon May 23 18:35:04 2011 +0100
drivers/passthrough: Revert 23352:ea48976517af -- incorrect bugfix.
Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
changeset: 23369:37c77bacb52a
user: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
date: Mon May 23 17:38:28 2011 +0100
Fix Config.mk's cc-option for -Wno-* options.
These disable-warning options are handled specially by GCC:
(a) they are ignored unless the compiler emits a warning; and
(b) even then they produce a warning rather than an error
To handle this, modify the test invocation of GCC to compile a
fragment of code that will always provoke a warning (integer assigned
to pointer). This works around (a) above.
Then, we grep the compiler's stdout/stderr for the option-under-test,
the presence of which would indicate an "unrecognized command-line
option" warning/error. This works around (b) above, letting us
distinguish between the "integer assigned to pointer" and
"unrecognized command-line option" warnings.
Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
(qemu changes not included)
reply other threads:[~2011-05-24 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=osstest-7307-mainreport@xen.org \
--to=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.