From: Platform Team regression test user <citrix-osstest@xenproject.org>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, osstest-admin@xenproject.org
Subject: [ovmf baseline-only test] 74663: all pass
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 08:20:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <osstest-74663-mainreport@xen.org> (raw)
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 74663 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/74663/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 3ff82ee5fc52c8e8764b407ec45cafab8452e2b9
baseline version:
ovmf 19f21ed91652d2a5160426ad8ca9219728d85aec
Last test of basis 74662 2018-05-02 20:48:34 Z 0 days
Testing same since 74663 2018-05-03 05:18:26 Z 0 days 1 attempts
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
jobs:
build-amd64-xsm pass
build-i386-xsm pass
build-amd64 pass
build-i386 pass
build-amd64-libvirt pass
build-i386-libvirt pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 pass
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on osstest.xs.citrite.net
logs: /home/osstest/logs
images: /home/osstest/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Push not applicable.
------------------------------------------------------------
commit 3ff82ee5fc52c8e8764b407ec45cafab8452e2b9
Author: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Date: Thu Apr 19 04:33:14 2018 +0800
SecurityPkg/UserProfileManagerDxe: Update RouteConfig function
According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration. This patch
ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
commit 546603d39d9a33a216d5a09a167a465b756b7704
Author: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Date: Thu Apr 19 04:33:13 2018 +0800
SecurityPkg/UserIdentifyManagerDxe: Update RouteConfig function
According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration. This patch
ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
commit b59ac35e7ac6bb6e46d73beae63dbfd5cb1d6d29
Author: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Date: Thu Apr 19 04:33:12 2018 +0800
SecurityPkg/PwdCredentialProviderDxe: Update RouteConfig function
According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration. This patch
ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
commit efa5343a23e1d72a80deb463259756ac86ae1632
Author: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Date: Thu Apr 19 04:33:11 2018 +0800
SecurityPkg/Tcg2Config: Update RouteConfig function
According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration. This patch
ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
commit 54b7f3cfc1b46a645fb2ff03bce3a00a7c8a784e
Author: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Date: Thu Apr 19 04:32:27 2018 +0800
MdeModulePkg/DriverHealthManagerDxe: Update RouteConfig function
According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration. This patch
ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
commit 124b18cfb3ff20d7a51ca87143605da9c54b86c9
Author: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Date: Thu Apr 19 04:32:26 2018 +0800
MdeModulePkg/RamDiskDxe: Update RouteConfig function
According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration. This patch
ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
commit e00cd9559095b3146c8349210137fd9fb6dc0edc
Author: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Date: Thu Apr 19 04:32:25 2018 +0800
MdeModulePkg/UiApp: Update RouteConfig function
According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration. This patch
ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
commit a82385958e6e5ffe8151ad71f0a47cb06e2d5b20
Author: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Date: Thu Apr 19 04:31:35 2018 +0800
IntelFrameworkModulePkg/LegacyBootMaintUiLib: Update RouteConfig function
According to UEFI spec, the RouteConfig protocol function should populate
the Progress pointer with an address inside Configuration. This patch
ensures that these functions are compliant when EFI_NOT_FOUND is returned.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Thomas Palmer <thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
reply other threads:[~2018-05-03 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=osstest-74663-mainreport@xen.org \
--to=citrix-osstest@xenproject.org \
--cc=osstest-admin@xenproject.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.