From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [SOLVED + PATCH]: documented Oops running big-endian reiserfs on parisc architecture
Date: 04 Sep 2001 11:44:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <oupoforxpc1.fsf@pigdrop.muc.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010902105538.A15344@middle.of.nowhere.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <20010902150023.U5126@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <20010902195717.A21209@middle.of.nowhere.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <20010903003437.A385@linux-m68k.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <20010903213835.A13887@fury.csh.rit.edu.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
In-Reply-To: Jeff Mahoney's message of "4 Sep 2001 03:41:51 +0200"
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> writes:
> I did kick around the idea of making those macros the default accessors for
> the deh_state member (which is the only place they're used), but it unfairly
> penalizes arches that don't need them.
On archs that don't need them {get,put}_unaligned should be just normal
assignments. They are certainly on i386.
-Andi
next parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-04 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20010902105538.A15344@middle.of.nowhere.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20010902150023.U5126@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20010902195717.A21209@middle.of.nowhere.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20010903003437.A385@linux-m68k.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20010903213835.A13887@fury.csh.rit.edu.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-09-04 9:44 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2001-09-04 10:04 ` [SOLVED + PATCH]: documented Oops running big-endian reiserfs on parisc architecture David S. Miller
2001-09-04 10:25 ` Andi Kleen
2001-09-04 10:29 ` David S. Miller
2001-09-04 10:52 ` [SOLVED + PATCH]: documented Oops running big-endian reiserfs Alan Cox
2001-09-04 12:50 ` [SOLVED + PATCH]: documented Oops running big-endian reiserfs on parisc architecture Jeff Mahoney
2001-09-04 22:55 Ulrich Weigand
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-04 17:04 Ulrich Weigand
2001-09-04 14:34 Ulrich Weigand
2001-09-04 15:02 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-09-04 16:09 ` John Alvord
2001-09-03 12:08 Ulrich Weigand
2001-09-03 13:14 ` Ralf Baechle
2001-09-03 22:24 ` David S. Miller
2001-09-08 1:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-09-02 8:55 [parisc-linux] " thunder7
2001-09-02 14:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-09-02 17:57 ` [SOLVED + PATCH]: " thunder7
2001-09-02 22:34 ` Richard Zidlicky
2001-09-02 23:08 ` David S. Miller
2001-09-04 1:38 ` Jeff Mahoney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=oupoforxpc1.fsf@pigdrop.muc.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=jeffm@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.