From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38060) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VdjKq-0008H7-Fj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 11:18:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VdjKl-0007Xj-QH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 11:18:32 -0500 Received: from static.88-198-71-155.clients.your-server.de ([88.198.71.155]:57033 helo=socrates.bennee.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VdjKl-0007XU-F5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 11:18:27 -0500 References: From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:18:26 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] integrator/cp: add support for REFCNTregisterr List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers , Jan =?utf-8?Q?Petrou=C5=A1?= peter.maydell@linaro.org writes: > On 5 November 2013 14:44, Jan Petrouš wrote: >> Hehe, duno, but when I started learning QEMU the Integrator devboard >> looked for me the nice start-up point = very simple to understand >> and only very basic, but still core, device list. > > QEMU's integrator model is really very minimally maintained. > A lot of its code is still using out of date ways of doing > things and hasn't been updated in years; my only test case > for it is an ancient 2.6.17 kernel. vexpress is rather > more maintained and I do at least occasionally test with > new kernels. I suspect it would be worth updating the QEMU wiki pages and building a simple vexpress image (or showing simple steps for the Linaro vexpress builds). I suspect Jan's choice was also influenced as mine by the fact it's the test ARM image mentioned on the wiki page. Of course the first time I ran it I found it had regressed also ;-) -- Alex Bennée