From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GNDBp-0008Do-Ga
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:40:57 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GNDBn-0008Cl-Bj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:40:56 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GNDBn-0008Ca-0H
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:40:55 -0400
Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
	(Exim 4.52) id 1GNDDK-0003ZG-RC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:42:31 -0400
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GNDBe-0001Mb-T6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:40:46 +0200
Received: from a84-231-49-3.elisa-laajakaista.fi ([84.231.49.3])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:40:46 +0200
Received: from ananaza by a84-231-49-3.elisa-laajakaista.fi with local (Gmexim
	0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:40:46 +0200
From: Antti P Miettinen <ananaza@iki.fi>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:40:30 +0300
Message-ID: <p2gzmd59bdt.fsf@doris.dna.fi>
References: <21288277.1158072277598.JavaMail.www@wwinf1515>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: ARM CPU Speed simulated by Qemu?
Reply-To: ananaza@iki.fi, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Laurent DESNOGUES <laurent.desnogues@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> There is a company that claims to be able to accurately
> simulate an at 200 Mhz (http://www.vastsystems.com).  I
> bet there are using statistical cycle counting and so
> are probably very wrong :)

Well, their simulation speed depends on the kind of code run and the
kind of models simulated, but their tools are indeed fast, presumably
mostly thanks to dynamic compilation. And at least the core models
seem quite accurate.

-- 
http://www.iki.fi/~ananaza/