From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [LOCKDEP] xfs: possible recursive locking detected
Date: 04 Jul 2006 14:42:42 +0200
Message-ID: <p7364idr16l.fsf@verdi.suse.de>
References: <20060704004116.GA7612@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru>
	<20060704011858.GG1605@parisc-linux.org>
	<20060704112503.H1495869@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
	<20060704063225.GA2752@elte.hu> <20060704084143.GA12931@elte.hu>
	<20060704191100.C1497438__38681.8935432986$1152004607$gmane$org@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	mingo@elte.hu
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:9444 "EHLO mx1.suse.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932248AbWGDMnI (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 4 Jul 2006 08:43:08 -0400
To: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060704191100.C1497438__38681.8935432986$1152004607$gmane$org@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com> writes:
> 
> That would be good, but it doesn't work for all situations
> unfortunately, and it would loose that debug-kernel sanity
> checking that we have in there which validates ilock/iolock
> ordering rules.

Isn't that obsolete now with lockdep?

-Andi