From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/5] ACPI: DMI blacklist for OSI(Linux) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:16:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1200565490-29619-1-git-send-email-lenb@kernel.org> <0bf08de2227cabeb40a6ea72b3fa188a2e325335.1200565331.git.len.brown@intel.com> <200801190250.28250.lenb@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:42239 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751775AbYASIQz (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:16:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200801190250.28250.lenb@kernel.org> (Len Brown's message of "Sat\, 19 Jan 2008 02\:50\:28 -0500") Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Len Brown Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Len Brown writes: > --- a/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/blacklist.c > @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ > /* > * blacklist.c > * > + * X86 specific ACPI blacklists. > + * > * Check to see if the given machine has a known bad ACPI BIOS > * or if the BIOS is too old. > * > @@ -165,3 +167,578 @@ int __init acpi_blacklisted(void) > > return blacklisted; > } > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMI IA64 sets CONFIG_DMI too. So it won't be x86 specific as written. Probably shoud check for CONFIG_X86 too. > +extern void dmi_osi_linux(int enable, const struct dmi_system_id *d); That should be in some include, shouldn't it? -Andi