From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com,
clameter@engr.sgi.com, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node
Date: 07 Feb 2007 11:20:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p73abzqmfpq.fsf@bingen.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702070002430.2188@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> writes:
>
> Would it be possible to attach the cpus to the
> next nodes with memory and mark the node offline? That way we could avoid
> another mask that we constantly have to check?
That is what x86-64 does and I believe is the right solution to this.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-07 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-06 11:23 [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-02-06 17:26 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-07 1:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-02-07 8:04 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-07 8:36 ` [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-02-07 8:36 ` [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-02-08 11:49 ` Bob Picco
2007-02-08 11:49 ` Bob Picco
2007-02-07 10:20 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-02-07 10:20 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-07 10:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-02-07 10:19 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-07 10:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-02-07 10:41 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-07 10:49 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-02-07 11:32 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-07 12:27 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-02-07 14:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-07 15:28 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-02-07 14:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-07 16:23 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-07 16:50 ` Andi Kleen
2007-02-07 17:43 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-07 18:15 ` [PATCH] FS : Speedup rw_verify_area() Eric Dumazet
2007-02-08 0:37 ` [2.6.20][PATCH] fix mempolicy error check on a system with memory-less-node KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-02-08 19:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-02-08 19:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-08 19:35 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=p73abzqmfpq.fsf@bingen.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.