From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030688AbWKOQnQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:43:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030685AbWKOQnQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:43:16 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:22977 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030688AbWKOQnP (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:43:15 -0500 To: "Jan Beulich" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix MTRR code References: <455B3D8B.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> From: Andi Kleen Date: 15 Nov 2006 17:43:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <455B3D8B.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Jan Beulich" writes: > While after a previous submission (about one and a half year ago) I got > told that the MTRR code is to be replaced by PAT use, this hasn't Work is going on, patches exist, but do need more work and more testing. I hope to put a subset (without new user interface) into -mm* for testing soon. > happened. Hence I'd like to ask to reconsider this patch until PAT > handling code shows up. Added thanks. Next time please only do one change / patch please. I also got one reject in generic.c for - if (base + size < 0x100) { + if (base < 0x100) { but I hope that's ok -Andi