From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: tidy up requested Date: 11 Aug 2005 01:08:04 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200508102321.49800.mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> <42FA8777.7000106@lanl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <42FA8777.7000106@lanl.gov> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ronald G Minnich Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Pratt List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ronald G Minnich writes: > So I can not convince you to allow multiple versions of xen on one machine? > > People who are using 2.0 and porting to 3.0 (like me and newsham and > ...) could sure use that setup! The standard way to do that would be to support $(prefix) properly. So you end up with $(prefix)/lib/xen .. $(prefix)/sbin $(prefix)/etc ... Like /opt/xen2/.... /opt/xen3/... etc. The problem would be to make sure that all tools that read files or execute programs know about the prefix. -Andi