From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932483AbWFHC2S (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 22:28:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932484AbWFHC2S (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 22:28:18 -0400 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:5579 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932483AbWFHC2R (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 22:28:17 -0400 To: Andreas Dilger Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] use unlikely() for current_kernel_time() loop References: <20060607173642.GA6378@schatzie.adilger.int> From: Andi Kleen Date: 08 Jun 2006 04:28:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20060607173642.GA6378@schatzie.adilger.int> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andreas Dilger writes: > Hello, > I just noticed this minor optimization. current_kernel_time() is called > from current_fs_time() so it is used fairly often but it doesn't use > unlikely(read_seqretry(&xtime_lock, seq)) as other users of xtime_lock do. > Also removes extra whitespace on the empty line above. It would be better to put the unlikely into the read_seqretry I guess. -Andi